Alternative payment models and innovation: a case study of US health system adoption of a sacubitril/valsartan to treat acute decompensated heart failure. (1st December 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Alternative payment models and innovation: a case study of US health system adoption of a sacubitril/valsartan to treat acute decompensated heart failure. (1st December 2020)
- Main Title:
- Alternative payment models and innovation: a case study of US health system adoption of a sacubitril/valsartan to treat acute decompensated heart failure
- Authors:
- Shafrin, Jason
Aliyev, Elmar R.
Brauer, Michelle
Park, Siyeon
Shen, Xian - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aim: To understand the financial impact of health system adoption of novel heart failure medications under US alternative payment models (APMs). Materials and methods: This study used a decision tree model to assess the financial impact of health system adoption of sacubitril/valsartan to treat acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). A comparator scenario modeled current health care utilization and cost for treating hospitalized ADHF patients with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB). The study then measured the impact of adopting sacubitril/valsartan to treat ADHF on health system economic outcomes. Differences in treatment efficacy were based on the PIONEER-HF clinical trial. The financial impact of changes in patient outcomes under the sacubitril/valsartan and ACEi/ARB arms was assessed across three APMs: the Medicare Shared Savings Program, Bundled Payments for Care Improvement, and fee-for-service payments adjusted according to the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program. Results: Sacubitril/valsartan reduced re-hospitalizations after an initial ADHF admission by 46.3% for individuals aged 18– 64 years and 23.4% for individuals aged ≥65 years. Health systems' financial benefit of adopting sacubitril/valsartan was $740 per ADHF case per year (PCPY). Savings were larger for patients aged ≥65 years ($803 PCPY) compared to those <65 years ($653 PCPY). The majority of the health system financial benefit came fromAbstract: Aim: To understand the financial impact of health system adoption of novel heart failure medications under US alternative payment models (APMs). Materials and methods: This study used a decision tree model to assess the financial impact of health system adoption of sacubitril/valsartan to treat acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). A comparator scenario modeled current health care utilization and cost for treating hospitalized ADHF patients with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB). The study then measured the impact of adopting sacubitril/valsartan to treat ADHF on health system economic outcomes. Differences in treatment efficacy were based on the PIONEER-HF clinical trial. The financial impact of changes in patient outcomes under the sacubitril/valsartan and ACEi/ARB arms was assessed across three APMs: the Medicare Shared Savings Program, Bundled Payments for Care Improvement, and fee-for-service payments adjusted according to the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program. Results: Sacubitril/valsartan reduced re-hospitalizations after an initial ADHF admission by 46.3% for individuals aged 18– 64 years and 23.4% for individuals aged ≥65 years. Health systems' financial benefit of adopting sacubitril/valsartan was $740 per ADHF case per year (PCPY). Savings were larger for patients aged ≥65 years ($803 PCPY) compared to those <65 years ($653 PCPY). The majority of the health system financial benefit came from changes in APM bonus and penalty reimbursements. Value-based payments from the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program ($1, 190 financial gain PCPY) and the Bundled Care Payment Improvement Initiative ($645 financial gain PCPY) produced larger financial benefits than participation in the Medicare Shared Savings Program ($253 financial gain PCPY). Limitations: The model uses clinical trial data, which may not reflect real-world outcomes. Further, the financial implications were modeled based only on three widely used APMs. Conclusion: Sacubitril/valsartan adoption decreased hospitalizations and led to a positive net financial impact on health systems after accounting for APM bonus payments. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of medical economics. Volume 23:Number 12(2021)
- Journal:
- Journal of medical economics
- Issue:
- Volume 23:Number 12(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 23, Issue 12 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 23
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0023-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- 1450
- Page End:
- 1460
- Publication Date:
- 2020-12-01
- Subjects:
- Alternative payment models -- heart failure -- health systems -- health care utilization -- financial impact -- angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors -- angiotensin-receptor blockers
I18 -- I10
Medical care -- Cost control -- Periodicals
Medical economics -- Periodicals
362.10941 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/jme ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/13696998.2020.1825454 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1369-6998
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5017.049500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22974.xml