Automated 'lights-out' searching of all recovered fingerprints: Review of the current workflow for latent fingerprint processing in Queensland, Australia. (August 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Automated 'lights-out' searching of all recovered fingerprints: Review of the current workflow for latent fingerprint processing in Queensland, Australia. (August 2022)
- Main Title:
- Automated 'lights-out' searching of all recovered fingerprints: Review of the current workflow for latent fingerprint processing in Queensland, Australia
- Authors:
- O'Malley, Troy
Krosch, Matt N.
Peacock, Paul
Cook, Rechelle
Neville, David H. - Abstract:
- Abstract: The process of linking an offender to a crime scene via their fingerprints has historically required significant human effort to compare latent fingerprints recovered from the scene with known fingerprints of a suspect. Increasing the speed of such comparisons, whilst maintaining accuracy and reliability and minimising error, is crucial for providing rapid intelligence to police investigators. One major opportunity for streamlining fingerprint examination is the adaptation of 'lights-out' technology to the comparison and matching of latent fingerprints. Here, we review the development, trial and validation process undertaken by the Queensland Police Service (QPS), Australia, to support implementation of a lights-out latent (LOL) workflow for automated latent fingerprint searching that is fully integrated with the existing case management systems. Targeted trials were undertaken using random selections of previously identified latent fingerprints that were searched using the LOL workflow against a local 10-print database. The results suggested that the LOL workflow could identify up to 44% of latent fingerprints with minimal human intervention and supported its implementation for all latent fingerprint comparisons in QPS casework. Review of LOL casework comparison outcomes for 2019 revealed that LOL-based identifications contributed approximately one quarter of all fingerprint identifications. Several procedural and technical factors that influenced the speed andAbstract: The process of linking an offender to a crime scene via their fingerprints has historically required significant human effort to compare latent fingerprints recovered from the scene with known fingerprints of a suspect. Increasing the speed of such comparisons, whilst maintaining accuracy and reliability and minimising error, is crucial for providing rapid intelligence to police investigators. One major opportunity for streamlining fingerprint examination is the adaptation of 'lights-out' technology to the comparison and matching of latent fingerprints. Here, we review the development, trial and validation process undertaken by the Queensland Police Service (QPS), Australia, to support implementation of a lights-out latent (LOL) workflow for automated latent fingerprint searching that is fully integrated with the existing case management systems. Targeted trials were undertaken using random selections of previously identified latent fingerprints that were searched using the LOL workflow against a local 10-print database. The results suggested that the LOL workflow could identify up to 44% of latent fingerprints with minimal human intervention and supported its implementation for all latent fingerprint comparisons in QPS casework. Review of LOL casework comparison outcomes for 2019 revealed that LOL-based identifications contributed approximately one quarter of all fingerprint identifications. Several procedural and technical factors that influenced the speed and efficiency of the LOL workflow are discussed, along with opportunities for improvement and future validation as an expert system. Graphical Abstract: ga1 Highlights: Automated latent fingerprint searching can provide rapid leads to investigators. Queensland Police successfully validated a lights-out workflow in 2015. Implemented for all casework fingerprints in 2016, palmprints in 2018. In 2019, lights-out latent identifications represented 25% of the yearly total. Improvements to match classification suggested using match score differences. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Forensic science international. Volume 337(2022)
- Journal:
- Forensic science international
- Issue:
- Volume 337(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 337, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 337
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0337-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-08
- Subjects:
- Validation -- 10-prints -- Matching -- Images -- Comparison -- Expert system
Medical jurisprudence -- Periodicals
Chemistry, Forensic -- Periodicals
Forensic Medicine -- Periodicals
Médecine légale -- Périodiques
Chimie légale -- Périodiques
Gerechtelijke geneeskunde
Gerechtelijke chemie
Gerechtelijke psychiatrie
Chemistry, Forensic
Medical jurisprudence
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
614.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/03790738 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/03790738 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03790738 ↗
http://infotrac.galegroup.com/itw/infomark/1/1/1/purl=rc18_EAIM_0__jn+%22Forensic+Science+International%22?sw_aep=stand ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/homepage/elecserv.htt ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111372 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0379-0738
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3987.764000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22963.xml