WE1.8 Is colon capsule effective at reducing the requirement for colonoscopy in symptomatic patients with a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) <100? Do patients find this an acceptable investigation?. (9th August 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- WE1.8 Is colon capsule effective at reducing the requirement for colonoscopy in symptomatic patients with a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) <100? Do patients find this an acceptable investigation?. (9th August 2022)
- Main Title:
- WE1.8 Is colon capsule effective at reducing the requirement for colonoscopy in symptomatic patients with a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) <100? Do patients find this an acceptable investigation?
- Authors:
- Lord, Ian
Fajardo, Winona
Owen, Ruth
Durango, Nichole
Basavaraju, Krishna
Wells, Antonia - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aim: To assess the effectiveness of colon capsule in reducing the need for colonoscopy and to review patient satisfaction for this investigation. Method: Potentially suitable patients for colon capsule were identified from 2 week wait referrals and patients referred to colorectal clinic. Inclusion criteria for consideration were; FIT <100, performance status 0–1 and aged 18–75. Data was collected for our first 20 patients for age, gender, FIT result, quality of the bowel preparation, pathology and the follow up outcome. Following completion of the investigation patients were invited to complete a feedback questionnaire. Results: The median age of patients was 58 (IQR 50–64) with 12 (60%) female patients. The median FIT result was <7 (IQR <7 to 33). The bowel preparation was excellent to good for 18 (90%) patients. Colon capsule was able to avoid colonoscopy for 14 (70%) patients. 6 (30%) patients required flexible sigmoidoscopy to complete the investigation or assess identified pathology. 15 (75%) patients completed patient satisfaction questionnaires, with all patients reporting little to no pain and little to no embarrassment. 9 of 13 (69%) respondents would choose to have a colon capsule again if further investigation was required. Overall patient experience was positive with a median satisfaction score 8/10 (IQR 5–10) with 10 being very satisfied. Conclusions: Our units initial experience supports the findings of other pilot studies, that the majority ofAbstract: Aim: To assess the effectiveness of colon capsule in reducing the need for colonoscopy and to review patient satisfaction for this investigation. Method: Potentially suitable patients for colon capsule were identified from 2 week wait referrals and patients referred to colorectal clinic. Inclusion criteria for consideration were; FIT <100, performance status 0–1 and aged 18–75. Data was collected for our first 20 patients for age, gender, FIT result, quality of the bowel preparation, pathology and the follow up outcome. Following completion of the investigation patients were invited to complete a feedback questionnaire. Results: The median age of patients was 58 (IQR 50–64) with 12 (60%) female patients. The median FIT result was <7 (IQR <7 to 33). The bowel preparation was excellent to good for 18 (90%) patients. Colon capsule was able to avoid colonoscopy for 14 (70%) patients. 6 (30%) patients required flexible sigmoidoscopy to complete the investigation or assess identified pathology. 15 (75%) patients completed patient satisfaction questionnaires, with all patients reporting little to no pain and little to no embarrassment. 9 of 13 (69%) respondents would choose to have a colon capsule again if further investigation was required. Overall patient experience was positive with a median satisfaction score 8/10 (IQR 5–10) with 10 being very satisfied. Conclusions: Our units initial experience supports the findings of other pilot studies, that the majority of symptomatic patients with a FIT <100 do not require a colonoscopy following colon capsule. Patients appear to find this an acceptable method to investigate their symptoms. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 109(2022)Supplement 5
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 109(2022)Supplement 5
- Issue Display:
- Volume 109, Issue 5 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 109
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0109-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-08-09
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/bjs/znac248.094 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22970.xml