Varied Response of EEG Rhythm to Different tDCS Protocols and Lesion Hemispheres in Stroke Subjects with Upper Limb Dysfunction. (30th July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Chunfang; Chen, Yuanyuan; Song, Peiqing; Yu, Hongli; Du, Jingang; Zhang, Ying; Sun, Changcheng
• Other Names: Baroncelli Laura Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: Neural plasticity. Volume 2022(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-07-30
• Subjects: Neuroplasticity -- Periodicals; 612.82
• DOI: 10.1155/2022/7790730
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2090-5904

Abstract

Abstract : Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) provides a way to modulate the cortical activity and promote motor rehabilitation following stroke. However, evidence indicates that the response to tDCS is highly variable. This study was aimed at exploring rhythmic response of Electroencephalography (EEG) to three tDCS protocols in stroke subjects. We hypothesize that tDCS protocols may interact with stoke characteristics, and electrode placement may affect cortical activity which could be reflected by the EEG rhythm. 32 subjects with unilateral stroke were recruited to a single-blinded, randomized, and controlled crossover experiment. All of the subjects underwent four tDCS protocols (anodal (atDCS), cathodal (ctDCS), and bilateral tDCS (bi-tDCS) and sham) with an interval of at least 1 week. Resting-state EEG was acquired before and after the stimulation. We tested the change of EEG spectral power after tDCS and the difference of change among four protocols using the paired-sample t -test and repeated measures analysis of variance. Then, we investigated the clinical factors affecting the above changes using the linear and quadratic regression model. According to the results, EEG responded to atDCS and bi-tDCS protocols on alpha and beta rhythm and subjects with a left lesion had higher response than those with the right lesion. Besides that, the change of alpha and beta power after atDCS and of beta power after bi-tDCS showed association with clinical characteristics only in subjects with the left lesion. In conclusion, the study found varied EEG response with different protocols, lesion hemispheres, and other clinical characteristics supporting the individualized cortical oscillatory effect induced by tDCS.