Covariate Selection for Estimating Individual Treatment Effects in Psychotherapy Research: A Simulation Study and Empirical Example. (September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wester, Robin Anno; Rubel, Julian; Mayer, Axel
• Is Part Of: Clinical psychological science. Volume 10:Number 5(2022)
• Page Start: 920
• Page End: 940
• Publication Date: 2022-09
• Subjects: personalized medicine -- individual treatment effects -- machine learning -- LASSO -- stepwise regression -- depression -- open data; Clinical psychology -- Periodicals; 616.89
• DOI: 10.1177/21677026211071043
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2167-7026

Abstract

Estimating individual treatment effects (ITEs) is crucial to personalized psychotherapy. It depends on identifying all covariates that interact with treatment, a challenging task considering the many patient characteristics hypothesized to influence treatment outcome. The goal of this study was to compare different covariate-selection strategies and their consequences on estimating ITEs. A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to compare stepwise regression with and without cross-validation and shrinkage methods. The study was designed to mimic the setting of psychotherapy studies. No single covariate-selection strategy dominated all others across all factor-level combinations and on all performance measures. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator showed the most accurate out-of-sample predictions, identified the highest number of true treatment-covariate interactions, and estimated ITEs with the highest precision across the most conditions. Domain backward stepwise regression and backward stepwise regression using Bayesian information criterion were least biased in estimating variance of ITEs across the most conditions.