Benefit of Capsule Endoscopy in the Setting of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Patients Above Age 65. Issue 1 (15th December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lee, Joseph G; Galorport, Cherry; Yonge, Jordan; Enns, Robert A
• Is Part Of: Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. Volume 3:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 36
• Page End: 43
• Publication Date: 2018-12-15
• Subjects: Iron deficiency anemia -- Capsule endoscopy -- Capsule -- Anemia -- Elderly; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; 616.33005
• DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwy058
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2515-2084

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a common indication for a capsule endoscopy (CE), which is often offered after a negative bidirectional endoscopy. Since malignancy is a concern in the older population with IDA, upper and lower endoscopic exams are typically performed. If these tests are negative, CE may be offered to evaluate the small intestine. However, choosing the ideal candidates who are most likely to benefit from a CE study is challenging. Aims: The goal of this study was to assess the outcomes for CE in patients with IDA over age 65 and assess which factors are more likely to contribute to a positive CE yield. Methods: A retrospective review of all CE studies at St. Paul's Hospital from January 2010 to June 2016 was conducted after ethics approval. Inclusion criteria included the following: age >65, hemoglobin <120 g/L, serum ferritin <70 μg/L, and at least one high-quality complete EGD/colonoscopy performed before CE. Variables to assess factors that are more likely to contribute to a positive capsule yield included use of anticoagulation medications, NSAIDs, PPIs, transfusion burden and cardiac disease. A Chi-Square test was then used to determine clinical predictive factors of a positive and negative study. Results: There were 1149 CE studies that were reviewed, of which 130 CE studies met inclusion criteria. Fifty-one studies (40.6%) had positive findings, and from this group, 30 (58.8%) recommended active intervention (i.e., EGD, n = 8; colonoscopy, n = 12; push enteroscopy, n = 3; double-balloon [DB] enteroscopy, n = 2; small bowel resection, n = 3; escalation of Crohn's therapy, n = 2), while 21 (41.2%) were managed supportively, typically with iron supplementation. Most negative studies (73 of 79) recommended supportive therapy (other recommendations included hematological workup, n = 3; hiatal hernia repair, n = 1; proton-pump inhibitors [PPI] initiation, n = 1; stop donating blood, n = 1). A history of cardiac disease had a significant association with positive findings (0.54 versus 0.33, P = 0.001). Conversely, a known history of low ferritin levels (0.84 versus 0.68, P = 0.046) and a known history of hiatal hernia (0.25 versus 0.08, P = 0.012) were associated with a negative study. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the clinical yield of CE in IDA in patients above age 65 is relatively low. The majority of all CE studies recommended supportive therapy or repeat endoscopic exams (EGD/colonoscopy) of areas previously assessed and lesions missed. Provided that initial endoscopic exams were thorough and Crohn's disease management was optimized, the overall rate of changing management significantly was low at five of 130 studies (two DB enteroscopies and three resections) or 3.8%. Clinical factors focusing on cardiac history, ferritin levels and the presence of a hiatal hernia may be of utility to predict benefit of CE. Emphasis on these data may help select more appropriate patients for capsule endoscopy.