Surgical Management of Distal Clavicle Fractures in Skeletally Immature Athletes. Issue 5 (31st May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jasty, Naveen; Waters, Peter M.; Bae, Donald S.; Heyworth, Benton E.
• Is Part Of: Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine. Volume 10:Issue 5(2022)Supplement 2
• Publication Date: 2022-05-31
• Subjects: Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Arthroscopy -- Periodicals; Arthroplasty -- Periodicals; Knee -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 616.7
• DOI: 10.1177/2325967121S00446
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2325-9671

Abstract

Background: Distal clavicle fractures account for a significant proportion of clavicle fractures in the pediatric and adolescent age groups, but clinical decision making to date has largely been informed by adult studies. However, surgical treatment in this younger population may have unique technical and clinical considerations, due to distinct fracture patterns, increased healing potential and periosteal thickness. Hypothesis/Purpose: The objective of this study was to characterize distal clavicle fractures in a cohort of pediatric and adolescent athletes who underwent operative treatment at a single, tertiary-care pediatric center, including surgical techniques used and resultant clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all operatively-treated clavicle fractures extending to the coracoclavicular ligaments or lateral, between 2005-2020. Patients >19 years-old or those with pathological fractures were excluded. Radiographic characteristics, surgical fixation construct, time to radiographic healing, return to sports, and complications were analyzed. Results: Fifty-two patients were identified, with mean age 13.8 ± 2.2 years. The majority of fractures were classified as Nenopoulus type IIB (transverse, displaced; 42.3%) or type IIIB (oblique, displaced; 26.9%), with type IIA (transverse, minor displacement; 3.8%), IV (comminuted; 11.6%), and V (AC dislocation; 15.4%) patterns also observed. Primary direction of displacement was posterior in 90% of cases and superior in 10%. Plate fixation was performed in 53.8% of surgeries, with locking plate (26.9%) and hook plate (17.3%) most frequent. Suture-based fixation was performed in 32.7% of cases (Figure 1). Rate of removal of implants was 66% after plate fixation, the majority of which (72.2%) were planned at the time of primary fixation. Patient age was comparable in suture and plate cohorts (12.9 vs. 13.5, p = 0.19). Total complication rate, including unplanned removal of implants, was higher in the plate fixation group (25%) than in the suture-based fixation group (11.2%). Time to radiographic healing was not significantly different between plate and suture-based constructs (2.9 vs. 2.9 months, p = 0.96) though patients with suture-based constructs returned to sport faster (2.5 vs. 3.6 months, p = 0.014). Conclusion: The vast majority of distal clavicle fractures treated operatively in pediatric and adolescent athletes are posteriorly displaced fractures. When chosen in the appropriate patient, suture-only constructs can lead to similar healing and faster return to sports compared to plate-based constructs, with greatly reduced need for removal of hardware. These data provide a foundation for future comparative research further elucidating precise surgical indications and optimal treatment approaches. Table 1. Fixation Methods for Distal Clavicle Fractures