Efficacy of soft tissue substitutes, in comparison with autogenous grafts, in surgical procedures aiming to increase the peri‐implant keratinized mucosa: A systematic review. (28th June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Montero, Eduardo; Molina, Ana; Matesanz, Paula; Monje, Alberto; Sanz‐Sánchez, Ignacio; Herrera, David
• Is Part Of: Clinical oral implants research. Volume 33(2022)Supplement 23
• Page Start: 32
• Page End: 46
• Publication Date: 2022-06-28
• Subjects: dental implants -- free gingival graft -- keratinized mucosa -- soft tissue substitutes; Dental implants -- Research -- Periodicals; 617.69
• DOI: 10.1111/clr.13751
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0905-7161

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of soft tissue substitutes compared to autogenous gingival grafts in surgical procedures aimed at increasing the width of keratinized mucosa (KM) around dental implants. Materials and Methods: Two focused questions were developed: PICOS #1) "What is the efficacy of surgical procedures using soft tissue substitutes, as compared to autogenous grafts, to increase the amount of peri‐implant keratinized mucosa, in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs)?"; and PICOS #2) "What is the effectiveness of soft tissue substitutes to increase the amount of peri‐implant keratinized mucosa, in RCTs, CCTs, cohort studies or case series?". Besides KM augmentation, other relevant outcomes such as clinical and radiographic peri‐implant outcomes, incidence of biological complications, surgical time, or patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected. Meta‐analyses were performed whenever possible. Results: Ten publications and an unpublished study were included. KM augmentation was significantly greater for autogenous grafts ( n = 6; weighted mean difference (WMD) = −0.9 mm; 95% confidence interval (CI) [−1.4; −0.3]; p = .001). However, no significant differences between autogenous grafts and soft tissue substitutes were observed when exclusively xenografts were considered ( n = 5; WMD=−0.8 mm; 95% CI [−1.6; 0.0]; p = .062). Surgical time and postsurgical pain seemed to be reduced by the use of soft tissue substitutes. Conclusions: Free gingival grafts (FGG) are more effective in the augmentation of KM mucosa around dental implants than soft tissue substitutes. However, substitutes of xenogeneic origin may be an alternative to autogenous tissues.