Empirical Bayes shrinkage and false discovery rate estimation, allowing for unwanted variation. (6th July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gerard, David; Stephens, Matthew
• Is Part Of: Biostatistics. Volume 21:Number 1(2020)
• Page Start: 15
• Page End: 32
• Publication Date: 2018-07-06
• Subjects: Batch effects -- Empirical Bayes -- RNA-seq -- Surrogate variable analysis -- Unobserved confounding -- Unwanted variation; Medical statistics -- Periodicals; Biometry -- Periodicals; Health risk assessment -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Research -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; 610.727
• DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxy029
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1465-4644

Abstract

Summary: We combine two important ideas in the analysis of large-scale genomics experiments (e.g. experiments that aim to identify genes that are differentially expressed between two conditions). The first is use of Empirical Bayes (EB) methods to handle the large number of potentially-sparse effects, and estimate false discovery rates and related quantities. The second is use of factor analysis methods to deal with sources of unwanted variation such as batch effects and unmeasured confounders. We describe a simple modular fitting procedure that combines key ideas from both these lines of research. This yields new, powerful EB methods for analyzing genomics experiments that account for both sparse effects and unwanted variation. In realistic simulations, these new methods provide significant gains in power and calibration over competing methods. In real data analysis, we find that different methods, while often conceptually similar, can vary widely in their assessments of statistical significance. This highlights the need for care in both choice of methods and interpretation of results.