Blower-door estimates of PM2.5 deposition rates and penetration factors in an idealized room. Issue 8 (October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lai, Yonghang; Ridley, Ian; Brimblecombe, Peter
• Is Part Of: Indoor + built environment. Volume 31:Issue 8(2022)
• Page Start: 2064
• Page End: 2082
• Publication Date: 2022-10
• Subjects: Air change rates -- Furnishings -- Indoor characteristics -- Air tightness -- Pressure differences; Indoor air pollution -- Periodicals; Sick building syndrome -- Periodicals; Buildings -- Environmental engineering -- Periodicals; Environmental health -- Periodicals; 613.5
• DOI: 10.1177/1420326X20944427
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1420-326X

Abstract

Particle deposition and penetration in buildings has been widely studied, but the effect of indoor characteristics merits further investigation, so improved experimental methods may be needed. The present study measured indoor and outdoor concentrations of PM2.5 and estimated PM2.5 deposition rates and penetration factors under a variety of different indoor situations, with a novel method (blower-door method). The blower-door method is compared with the standard decay and rebound method for an idealized room (a portable building test cell; 6.08 m × 2.40 m × 2.60 m) under eight testing scenarios (empty, cardboard boxes in three arrangements, terry cloth wall covering, and three sets of window holes); run three times to establish the coefficient of variation representing precision. Results show that higher induced indoor–outdoor pressure differences cause a larger variation of estimated effective deposition rate on different indoor surfaces. The deposition rate and penetration factor may be influenced by indoor surface materials. The blower-door method gives higher precision for the estimates, and detects subtle differences in penetration factors, which may be difficult using the decay and rebound method.