A comparison of test-retest reliability of four cognitive screening tools in people with dementia. Issue 15 (17th July 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A comparison of test-retest reliability of four cognitive screening tools in people with dementia. Issue 15 (17th July 2022)
- Main Title:
- A comparison of test-retest reliability of four cognitive screening tools in people with dementia
- Authors:
- Lee, Ya-Chen
Lin, Yi-Te
Chiu, En-Chi - Abstract:
- Abstract: Purpose: This study aimed to compare the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and the Saint Louis University Status Examination (SLUMS) in a single sample of people with dementia. Methods: Sixty people with dementia were assessed twice two weeks apart, and the test-retest reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for four screening tools. The MDC95 value was calculated based on the standard error of measurement to estimate the random measurement error. Results: The ICC values for screening tools were 0.86–0.90. The MDC95 values (MDC95 %) were 5.0 (17.2%), 2.74 (27%), 4.71(20%), and 6.26 (24%) for the MMSE, SPMSQ, MoCA, and SLUMS, respectively. Conclusions: Overall, the four screening tools were similar in test-retest reliability which imply that the MMSE, MoCA, SPMSQ, and SLUMS were reliable in monitoring cognitive function in people with dementia. The results of the direct comparisons of test-retest reliability of the four screening tools provide useful information for both clinicians and researchers to select an appropriate cognitive screening tool. Implications for Rehabilitation: The MMSE, MoCA, SPMSQ, and SLUMS are equally reliable and thus they could be used to monitor the cognitive function in people with dementia. The MDC values are useful in determiningAbstract: Purpose: This study aimed to compare the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and the Saint Louis University Status Examination (SLUMS) in a single sample of people with dementia. Methods: Sixty people with dementia were assessed twice two weeks apart, and the test-retest reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for four screening tools. The MDC95 value was calculated based on the standard error of measurement to estimate the random measurement error. Results: The ICC values for screening tools were 0.86–0.90. The MDC95 values (MDC95 %) were 5.0 (17.2%), 2.74 (27%), 4.71(20%), and 6.26 (24%) for the MMSE, SPMSQ, MoCA, and SLUMS, respectively. Conclusions: Overall, the four screening tools were similar in test-retest reliability which imply that the MMSE, MoCA, SPMSQ, and SLUMS were reliable in monitoring cognitive function in people with dementia. The results of the direct comparisons of test-retest reliability of the four screening tools provide useful information for both clinicians and researchers to select an appropriate cognitive screening tool. Implications for Rehabilitation: The MMSE, MoCA, SPMSQ, and SLUMS are equally reliable and thus they could be used to monitor the cognitive function in people with dementia. The MDC values are useful in determining whether a real change has occurred between repeated assessments for people with dementia. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Disability and rehabilitation. Volume 44:Issue 15(2022)
- Journal:
- Disability and rehabilitation
- Issue:
- Volume 44:Issue 15(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 44, Issue 15 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 44
- Issue:
- 15
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0044-0015-0000
- Page Start:
- 4090
- Page End:
- 4095
- Publication Date:
- 2022-07-17
- Subjects:
- Cognition -- screening tools -- reliability -- minimal detectable change -- people with dementia
People with disabilities -- Periodicals
Rehabilitation -- Periodicals
617.03 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/idre20 ↗
http://informahealthcare.com/journal/dre ↗
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/09638288.asp ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/09638288.2021.1891466 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0963-8288
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3595.420300
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22928.xml