Visual Attention to Health Warning Labels on Waterpipe Venue Menus in Immersive Virtual Reality. Issue 9 (4th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kidanu, Azieb W; Shi, Rui; Cruz-Cano, Raul; Feldman, Robert H; Butler, James; Dyer, Typhanye V; Fryer, Craig S; Varshney, Amitabh; Lee, Eric; Clark, Pamela I
• Is Part Of: Nicotine & tobacco research. Volume 24:Issue 9(2022)
• Page Start: 1469
• Page End: 1477
• Publication Date: 2022-02-04
• Subjects: Nicotine -- Periodicals; Tobacco -- Research -- Periodicals; Tobacco habit -- Periodicals; Nicotine -- Periodicals; Tobacco -- Periodicals; Smoking -- Periodicals; 613.85
• DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac030
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-2203

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: This study examined how health warning labels (HWL) on a waterpipe venue menu captured and held the attention of consumers and influenced waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. Aims and Methods: A randomized experiment ( N = 96) of young adult waterpipe smokers was conducted in an immersive virtual reality laboratory. Participants viewed one of two virtual reality scenarios, a menu with an HWL and nicotine concentration or menu without an HWL and nicotine concentration. Eye-tracking metrics were collected, and participants completed posttest questionnaires on demographics, tobacco use history, and WTS attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. T -tests were used to assess group differences, and a mediation analysis conducted to examine the relationship between the HWL and intention to quit WTS. Results: Participants in the HWL group demonstrated greater visual attention to the warning and nicotine areas and less visual attention to the flavor and ingredients areas of the menu compared to the control group. The HWL group demonstrated greater negative attitudes toward WTS ( p = .002), greater perceived risk of decreased lung function ( p = .026), and greater intention to quit WTS ( p = 0.003). The mediation model indicated the relationship between the HWL on a menu and intention to quit WTS was mediated by an increase in negative attitudes toward WTS. Conclusions: The HWLs on a menu captured and held the attention of consumers and increased negative attitudes, perceptions of health risk, and intention to quit WTS indicating potential benefit of including a warning label or nicotine concentration on menus to correct misperceptions of WTS. Implications: The study contributes to the broader literature on communicating the harms and risks of WTS. The findings suggest that HWL and nicotine concentration on waterpipe venue menus attract attention from consumers in environments comparable to the real world and the strategy warrants further exploration as a targeted policy intervention to educate the public and reduce the health burden of WTS.