D2 lymphadenectomy with complete mesogastrium excision vs. conventional D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Issue 10 (20th May 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- D2 lymphadenectomy with complete mesogastrium excision vs. conventional D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Issue 10 (20th May 2022)
- Main Title:
- D2 lymphadenectomy with complete mesogastrium excision vs. conventional D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer
- Authors:
- Meng, Xiangyu
Wang, Lu
Liu, Guangcong
Zhang, Jun
Wang, Yue
Yang, Dong
Zheng, Guoliang
Zhang, Tao
Zheng, Zhichao
Zhao, Yan - Editors:
- Ni, Jing
- Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: The complete mesogastrium excision (CME) based on D2 radical gastrectomy is believed to significantly reduce the local-regional recurrence compared with D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer, and it is widely used in China. This study aimed to explore whether D2 + CME is superior to D2 on surgical outcomes during gastrectomy from Chinese data. Methods: Feasible studies comparing the D2 + CME (D2 + CME group) and D2 (D2 group) published up to March 2020 are searched from electronic databases. The data showing surgical and complication outcomes are extracted to be pooled and analyzed. Results: Fourteen records including 1352 patients were included. The D2 + CME group had a shorter mean operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD] = —16.72 min, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −26.56 to −6.87 min, P < 0.001), lower mean blood loss (WMD = −39.08 mL, 95% CI: −49.94 to −28.21 mL, P < 0.001), higher mean number of retrieved lymph nodes (WMD = 2.13, 95% CI: 0.58–3.67, P = 0.007), shorter time to first flatus (WMD = −0.31 d, 95% CI: −0.53 to − 0.10 d, P = 0.005), and postoperative hospital days (WMD = −1.09, 95% CI: −1.92 to −0.25, P = 0.010) than the D2 group. Subgroup analysis suggested that the advantages from the D2 + CME group were obvious in traditional open radical gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy, and distal gastrectomy compared with D2 group. The evaluations of post-operative complications showed that the patients who underwentAbstract: Background: The complete mesogastrium excision (CME) based on D2 radical gastrectomy is believed to significantly reduce the local-regional recurrence compared with D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer, and it is widely used in China. This study aimed to explore whether D2 + CME is superior to D2 on surgical outcomes during gastrectomy from Chinese data. Methods: Feasible studies comparing the D2 + CME (D2 + CME group) and D2 (D2 group) published up to March 2020 are searched from electronic databases. The data showing surgical and complication outcomes are extracted to be pooled and analyzed. Results: Fourteen records including 1352 patients were included. The D2 + CME group had a shorter mean operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD] = —16.72 min, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −26.56 to −6.87 min, P < 0.001), lower mean blood loss (WMD = −39.08 mL, 95% CI: −49.94 to −28.21 mL, P < 0.001), higher mean number of retrieved lymph nodes (WMD = 2.13, 95% CI: 0.58–3.67, P = 0.007), shorter time to first flatus (WMD = −0.31 d, 95% CI: −0.53 to − 0.10 d, P = 0.005), and postoperative hospital days (WMD = −1.09, 95% CI: −1.92 to −0.25, P = 0.010) than the D2 group. Subgroup analysis suggested that the advantages from the D2 + CME group were obvious in traditional open radical gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy, and distal gastrectomy compared with D2 group. The evaluations of post-operative complications showed that the patients who underwent D2 + CME had a lower incidence of post-operative complications than the patients who underwent D2 surgery alone (relative risk [RR] = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.45–0.87, P = 0.003). The D2 radical gastrectomy plus CME improved 3-year overall survival (OS) (RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02–1.32, P = 0.020) and lowered the local recurrence rate (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.28–0.94, P = 0.030). The patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery or total gastrectomy had more significant advantages compared between D2 + CME and D2 groups in 3-year OS. Conclusion: The data from China show that D2 radical gastrectomy plus CME are reliable procedures and safety compared to D2 radical gastrectomy with faster recovery, lower risk, and better prognosis. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Chinese medical journal. Volume 135:Issue 10(2022)
- Journal:
- Chinese medical journal
- Issue:
- Volume 135:Issue 10(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 135, Issue 10 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 135
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0135-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- 1223
- Page End:
- 1230
- Publication Date:
- 2022-05-20
- Subjects:
- Complete mesogastrium excision -- Lymphadenectomy -- Advanced gastric cancer -- Review -- Meta-analysis
Medicine -- Periodicals
Medicine, Oriental -- Periodicals
Medicine
Medicine, Oriental
Medicine
Medicine, East Asian Traditional
Periodicals
Electronic journals
610.5 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/2337/ ↗
https://journals.lww.com/cmj/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://ckrd.cnki.net/grid20/Navi/item.aspx?NaviID=1&BaseID=ZHSS&NaviLink=%e5%8c%bb%e7%96%97%e5%8d%ab%e7%94%9f ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002023 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0366-6999
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22916.xml