Noninvasive Hemoglobin Monitoring for Postoperative Pediatric Orthopaedic Patients: A Preliminary Study. Issue 8 (13th September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mathew, Smitha E.; Pulido, Natalie; Larson, A. Noelle; Stans, Anthony A.; Milbrandt, Todd A.; Shaughnessy, William J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of pediatric orthopaedics. Volume 42:Issue 8(2022)
• Page Start: e897
• Page End: e900
• Publication Date: 2022-09-13
• Subjects: hemoglobin -- postoperative -- transfusion -- venipuncture; Pediatric orthopedics -- Periodicals; 618.927
• DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002199
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0271-6798

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Hemoglobin (Hgb) levels are frequently checked through venipuncture [invasive hemoglobin (iHgb)] in pediatric orthopaedic patients after high blood loss procedures. This needlestick may causes further anxiety and fear in hospitalized children. Noninvasive hemoglobin (nHgb) monitoring has been effectively utilized in the adult intensive care and postoperative total joint arthroplasty setting. nHgb monitoring has not yet been validated in children for routine postoperative Hgb assessment in pediatric orthopaedics. Methods: In this prospective study, 46 pediatric orthopaedic patients were enrolled who were undergoing surgery and postoperative standard of care iHgb testing. On postoperative day 1, Hgb levels were obtained through venipuncture and nHgb monitor (Pronto-7; Masimo) within a 2-hour period. Patient preferences, iHgb and nHgb values, time to result, and provider preferences were recorded. Cost data were estimated based on the standard Medicare payment rates for lab services versus the cost of nHgb probe. Results: nHgb results were obtained after 1 attempt in 38 patients (83%), after multiple attempts in 7 patients (15%), and could not be obtained in 1 patient. The mean time to obtain nHgb value was significantly shorter than that to obtain iHgb results (1.3±1.5 vs. 40±18.1 min; P <0.0001). The mean nHgb value was significantly higher than the mean iHgb value (11.7±1.5 vs. 10.6±1.1 g/dL, P <0.0001). nHgb exceeded iHgb by 2 g/dL or more in 12 (26%) patients (2.64±0.9 vs. 0.54±0.84 g/dL; P <0.0001). The concordance correlation coefficient between the 2 Hgb methods was 0.59, indicating moderate agreement. Forty-three (93%) of our patients and 34 (74%) of the care providers preferred nHgb over iHgb if results were equivalent. At our institution, the cost per iHgb monitoring is approximately $28 per blood draw as compared with $5 for nHgb monitoring. Interestingly, no patients required postoperative transfusion during the study period, as asymptomatic patients with no cardiac disease are typically observed unless the Hgb is <6. Conclusions: nHgb monitoring in postoperative pediatric patients overestimated Hgb levels compared with the standard of care methods; however, nHgb had high patient and provider satisfaction and had moderate agreement with iHgb. As no patients required transfusion, postoperative Hgb checks could likely be discontinued in some portion of our population. Level of Evidence: Level Ib—Diagnostic study.