Predictive Inverse Model for Advective Heat Transfer in a Short‐Circuited Fracture: Dimensional Analysis, Machine Learning, and Field Demonstration. Issue 11 (22nd November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hawkins, Adam J.; Fox, Don B.; Koch, Donald L.; Becker, Matthew W.; Tester, Jefferson W.
• Is Part Of: Water resources research. Volume 56:Issue 11(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-11-22
• Subjects: fracture -- tracer -- pressure -- heterogeneous -- machine learning -- principal component analysis; Hydrology -- Periodicals; 333.91
• DOI: 10.1029/2020WR027065
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0043-1397

Abstract

Abstract: Identifying fluid flow maldistribution in planar geometries is a well‐established problem in subsurface science/engineering. Of particular importance to the thermal performance of enhanced (or "engineered") geothermal systems is identifying the existence of nonuniform (i.e., heterogeneous) permeability and subsequently predicting advective heat transfer. Here, machine learning via a genetic algorithm (GA) identifies the spatial distribution of an unknown permeability field in a two‐dimensional Hele‐Shaw geometry (i.e., parallel plates). The inverse problem is solved by minimizing the L 2 norm between simulated residence time distribution (RTD) and measurements of an inert tracer breakthrough curve (BTC) (C‐Dot nanoparticle). Principal component analysis (PCA) of spatially correlated permeability fields enabled reduction of the parameter space by more than a factor of 10 and restricted the inverse search to reservoir‐scale permeability variations. Thermal experiments and tracer tests conducted at the mesoscale Altona Field Laboratory (AFL) demonstrate that the method accurately predicts the effects of extreme flow channeling on heat transfer in a single bedding‐plane rock fracture. However, this is only true when the permeability distributions provide adequate matches to both tracer RTD and frictional pressure loss. Without good agreement to frictional pressure loss, it is still possible to match a simulated RTD to measurements, but subsequent predictions of heat transfer are grossly inaccurate. The results of this study suggest that it is possible to anticipate the thermal effects of flow maldistribution, but only if both simulated RTDs and frictional pressure loss between fluid inlets and outlets are in good agreement with measurements. Key Points: Joint pressure‐tracer calibration is necessary to identify reservoir short‐circuiting in a single planar fracture Machine learning (genetic algorithm) accurately forecasts rapid heat transfer measured in mesoscale experiments (Altona Field Laboratory) Principal component analysis reduced the number of solved variables by more than a factor of 10