Exploring label dynamics of velocity‐selective arterial spin labeling in the kidney. Issue 1 (4th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bones, Isabell K.; Franklin, Suzanne L.; Harteveld, Anita A.; van Osch, Matthias J. P.; Schmid, Sophie; Hendrikse, Jeroen; Moonen, Chrit; van Stralen, Marijn; Bos, Clemens
• Is Part Of: Magnetic resonance in medicine. Volume 86:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 131
• Page End: 142
• Publication Date: 2021-02-04
• Subjects: arterial spin labeling -- Buxton curve -- FAIR -- multi‐PLD ASL -- renal perfusion -- velocity‐selective labeling; Nuclear magnetic resonance -- Periodicals; Electron paramagnetic resonance -- Periodicals; 616.07548
• DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28683
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0740-3194

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Velocity‐selective arterial spin labeling (VSASL) has been proposed for renal perfusion imaging to mitigate planning challenges and effects of arterial transit time (ATT) uncertainties. In VSASL, label generation may shift in the vascular tree as a function of cutoff velocity. Here, we investigate label dynamics and especially the ATT of renal VSASL and compared it with a spatially selective pulsed arterial spin labeling technique, flow alternating inversion recovery (FAIR). Methods: Arterial spin labeling data were acquired in 7 subjects, using free‐breathing dual VSASL and FAIR with five postlabeling delays: 400, 800, 1200, 2000, and 2600 ms. The VSASL measurements were acquired with cutoff velocities of 5, 10, and 15 cm/s, with anterior–posterior velocity‐encoding direction. Cortical perfusion‐weighted signal, temporal SNR, quantified renal blood flow, and arterial transit time were reported. Results: In contrast to FAIR, renal VSASL already showed fairly high signal at the earliest postlabeling delays, for all cutoff velocities. The highest VSASL signal and temporal SNR was obtained with a cutoff velocity of 10 cm/s at postlabeling delay = 800 ms, which was earlier than for FAIR at 1200 ms. Fitted ATT on VSASL was ≤ 0 ms, indicating ATT insensitivity, which was shorter than for FAIR (189 ± 79 ms, P < .05). Finally, the average cortical renal blood flow measured with cutoff velocities of 5 cm/s (398 ± 84 mL/min/100 g) and 10 cm/s (472 ± 160 mL/min/100 g) were similar to renal blood flow measured with FAIR (441 ± 84 mL/min/100 g) ( P > .05) with good correlations on subject level. Conclusion: Velocity‐selective arterial spin labeling in the kidney reduces ATT sensitivity compared with the recommended pulsed arterial spin labeling method, as well as if cutoff velocity is increased to reduce spurious labeling due to motion. Thus, VSASL has potential as a method for time‐efficient, single‐time‐point, free‐breathing renal perfusion measurements, despite lower tSNR than FAIR.