On the model building for transmission line cables: a Bayesian approach. Issue 12 (2nd December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hernández, W. P.; Castello, D. A.; Matt, C. F. T.
• Is Part Of: Inverse problems in science and engineering. Volume 26:Issue 12(2018)
• Page Start: 1784
• Page End: 1812
• Publication Date: 2018-12-02
• Subjects: Stranded cables -- bending vibrations -- fractional derivative -- Bayesian model updating -- Bayesian model class selection; 62F15 -- 74H45 -- 65C05 -- 93A30 -- 34A08; Engineering mathematics -- Periodicals; Inverse problems (Differential equations) -- Periodicals; 620.001515357
• DOI: 10.1080/17415977.2018.1436171
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1741-5977

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This work is aimed at building models to predict the bending vibrations of stranded cables used in high-voltage transmission lines. The present approach encompasses model calibration, validation and selection based on a statistical framework. Model calibration is tackled using a Bayesian framework and the Delayed Rejection Adaptive Metropolis (DRAM) sampling algorithm is employed to explore the posterior probability of the unknown model parameters. Two model classes are proposed to predict the bending vibrations of a typical high-voltage stranded cable. Both model classes account for the aerodynamic damping with the surrounding medium and the bending stiffness of the cable. The difference between the two relies on the damping model chosen to quantify the energy dissipation due to friction among the constituent wires of the cable. Model ranking is rigorously quantified by means of a Bayesian model class selection approach, in which both the data-fitting capability and complexity of each model class are simultaneously taken into account. Experimental tests are performed on a laboratory span with a typical high-voltage stranded cable. The measured frequency response functions are the observable quantities employed in the Bayesian model updating for the two model classes proposed. Both model classes provide comparable and accurate predictions for the cable's frequency response functions within the range [5, 25] Hz, with the fractional derivative-based model class providing the most accurate predictions. Nonetheless, both model classes failed to accurately reproduce the measured cable's dynamic response within the frequency range [25, 30] Hz.