Partitioning the impacts of land use/land cover change and climate variability on water supply over the source region of the Blue Nile Basin. (25th March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Belete, Marye; Deng, Jinsong; Abubakar, Ghali A.; Teshome, Menberu; Wang, Ke; Woldetsadik, Muluneh; Zhu, Enyan; Comber, Alexis; Gudo, Adam
• Is Part Of: Land degradation & development. Volume 31:Number 15(2020)
• Page Start: 2168
• Page End: 2184
• Publication Date: 2020-03-25
• Subjects: impact of LULC and climate variability -- InVEST -- LULC change -- climate variability -- water yield; Land degradation -- Periodicals; Soil conservation -- Periodicals; Reclamation of land -- Periodicals; Land use -- Periodicals; Economic development -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; 333.7315
• DOI: 10.1002/ldr.3589
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1085-3278

Abstract

Abstract: Water plays a vital role in sustaining the natural functioning of the entire ecosystem that supports life on Earth. It plays key roles in the well‐being of society in numerous ways. However, climate variability and land use land cover (LULC) change have caused spatiotemporal water supply variation. Disentangling the effects of climate variability from LULC change on water supply is crucial for sustainable water resource management. The main purpose of this study is, therefore, to disentangle the relative contribution of LULC change and climate variability to the overall average annual water supply variation. Residual trends analysis combined with Integrated Valuation of Environmental Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) annual water yield model was adopted to perform simulations and disentangle the relative impacts of climate variability and LULC change. Ground and satellite data were used in this study. The study area has experienced a significant increasing wetness trend and significant LULC dynamics between 2003 and 2017. As a result, an increasing water supply was observed due to the joint effects of climate variability and LULC change in the watershed (203 mm). The contribution of climate variability was 94%, whereas LULC contributes only 6% from 2003 to 2017. Climate variability negatively led to water supply variation while LULC change contributed positively from 2010 to 2017. Although the ongoing soil and water conservation (SWC) practices improved vegetation cover and water retention of the watershed, climate variability is the main driver of water supply variation. Therefore, SWC practices should incorporate ecosystem‐based climate change adaptation strategies and scale up to community‐based integrated watershed management to sustain water supply.