Evaluating suggested stricter gamma criteria for linac-based patient-specific delivery QA in the conventional and SBRT environments. (August 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evaluating suggested stricter gamma criteria for linac-based patient-specific delivery QA in the conventional and SBRT environments. (August 2022)
- Main Title:
- Evaluating suggested stricter gamma criteria for linac-based patient-specific delivery QA in the conventional and SBRT environments
- Authors:
- Price, Robert A.
Veltchev, Iavor
Lin, Teh
Eldib, Ahmed
Chen, Lili
Jin, Lihui
Chen, Xiaoming
Liu, Jie
Wang, Lu
Ma, C.-M. Charlie - Abstract:
- Highlights: Stricter γ criteria may have practical implications including treatment start delays. VMAT site-specific delivery QA tolerance limits are unnecessary. IMRT/VMAT QA passing rate and plan complexity do not correlate over the range studied. VMAT SBRT QA passing rates do not correlate with target volume over the range studied. Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate AAPM TG-218 recommended tolerances for IMRT QA for conventional and SBRT delivery. Methods: QA analysis was repeated for 150 IMRT/VMAT patients with varying gamma criteria. True composite delivery was utilized, corrected for detector and output variation. Universal tolerance (TLuniv ) and action limits (ALuniv ) were compared with statistical process control (SPC) TLSPC and ALSPC values. Analysis was repeated as a function of plan complexity for 250 non-stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) VMAT patients at 3%/2mm and a threshold of 10% and for 75 SBRT VMAT patients at 2%/2 mm and a threshold of 50% with results plotted as a function of PTV volume. Regions of failure were dose-scaled on the planning CT data sets based on delivery results. Results: The IMRT/VMAT TLSPC and ALSPC for gamma criteria of 3%/3 mm were 96.5% and 95.6% and for 3%/2 mm were 91.2% and 89.2%, respectively. Correlation with plan complexity for conventional fractionation VMAT was "low" for all sites with pelvis having the highest r value at −0.35. The equivalent SBRT PTV diameter ranged from 2.0 cm to 5.6 cm. Negative low correlation was foundHighlights: Stricter γ criteria may have practical implications including treatment start delays. VMAT site-specific delivery QA tolerance limits are unnecessary. IMRT/VMAT QA passing rate and plan complexity do not correlate over the range studied. VMAT SBRT QA passing rates do not correlate with target volume over the range studied. Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate AAPM TG-218 recommended tolerances for IMRT QA for conventional and SBRT delivery. Methods: QA analysis was repeated for 150 IMRT/VMAT patients with varying gamma criteria. True composite delivery was utilized, corrected for detector and output variation. Universal tolerance (TLuniv ) and action limits (ALuniv ) were compared with statistical process control (SPC) TLSPC and ALSPC values. Analysis was repeated as a function of plan complexity for 250 non-stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) VMAT patients at 3%/2mm and a threshold of 10% and for 75 SBRT VMAT patients at 2%/2 mm and a threshold of 50% with results plotted as a function of PTV volume. Regions of failure were dose-scaled on the planning CT data sets based on delivery results. Results: The IMRT/VMAT TLSPC and ALSPC for gamma criteria of 3%/3 mm were 96.5% and 95.6% and for 3%/2 mm were 91.2% and 89.2%, respectively. Correlation with plan complexity for conventional fractionation VMAT was "low" for all sites with pelvis having the highest r value at −0.35. The equivalent SBRT PTV diameter ranged from 2.0 cm to 5.6 cm. Negative low correlation was found for 38 of 75 VMAT cases below ALuniv . Conclusions: The ALuniv and ALSPC are similar for 3%/2 mm. However, our 5% failure rate for ALuniv, may result in treatment start delays approximately 2 times/month, given 40 new cases/month. VMAT QA failure at stricter criteria did not correlate strongly with plan complexity. Site-specific action limits vary less than 3% from the average. SBRT QA results do not strongly correlate with target size over the range studied. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Physica medica. Volume 100(2022)
- Journal:
- Physica medica
- Issue:
- Volume 100(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 100, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 100
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0100-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- 72
- Page End:
- 80
- Publication Date:
- 2022-08
- Subjects:
- Gamma criteria -- IMRT -- VMAT QA
Medical physics -- Periodicals
Biophysics -- Periodicals
Biophysics -- Periodicals
Imagerie médicale -- Périodiques
Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Rayons X -- Sécurité -- Mesures -- Périodiques
Physique -- Périodiques
Médecine -- Périodiques
610.153 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/11201797 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/11201797 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/11201797 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.physicamedica.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.06.005 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1120-1797
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6475.070000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22870.xml