Are Younger Patients Undergoing THA Appropriately Characterized as Active?. Issue 3 (March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Keeney, James A.; Nunley, Ryan M.; Baca, Geneva R.; Clohisy, John C.
• Is Part Of: Clinical orthopaedics and related research. Volume 473:Issue 3(2015)
• Publication Date: 2015-03
• Subjects: Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Research -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Research -- Periodicals; Chirurgie orthopédique -- Périodiques; 616.7005
• DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3952-8
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0009-921X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Surgeons perform THA to address a variety of conditions in younger patients, including osteoarthritis (OA), osteonecrosis, inflammatory arthritis, and congenital deformities. Younger patients aged 50 years or younger have been characterized as active in the literature, but a direct relationship between age and activity level has not been well substantiated. Younger patients with OA may engage in higher activity levels; however, associated medical conditions in patients with other surgical indications may not support a generalization that age is a surrogate for activity level. We recently evaluated these issues in younger patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and noted that the majority would not be considered active. Given this observation, we considered whether younger patients undergoing THA are characterized by high activity levels, which is relevant to understanding the long‐term risk of wear‐related failures. Questions/purposes: (1) Do demographic features of younger patients undergoing THA support high activity expectations? (2) Do preoperative or postoperative functional activity measures support projections that younger patients are active after THA? Methods: We retrospectively compared demographic characteristics and functional activity profiles (as determined by preoperative and postoperative UCLA activity scores, Harris hip scores [HHS], and SF‐12 and WOMAC physical function subscores) of 704 patients who had undergone THA and were aged younger than 50 years (822 hips) with those of 484 patients (516 hips) aged between 65 and 75 years, who had undergone THA, with a minimum followup at 1 year after surgery (range, 12‐160 months). Results: Compared with patients aged 65 to 75 years, younger patients undergoing THA were more often men (51%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 48.8%‐53.2% versus 40%, 95% CI, 37.1%‐42.9% women; p < 0.01) or had undergone surgery for osteonecrosis (29% versus 4%; 95% CI, 2.8%‐5.2%; p < 0.001). Postoperative HHS, SF‐12, and WOMAC scores were not appreciably different between the two patient groups. Compared with older patients, younger patients with OA had higher preoperative (5.0 ± 2.5 versus 3.9 ± 2.0, p < 0.001) and postoperative UCLA activity scores (6.8 ± 2.1 versus 5.3 ± 1.9, p < 0.001). Younger patients with diagnoses other than OA had slightly higher mean postoperative UCLA activity scores than older patients (6.0 ± 2.3 versus 5.3 ± 1.9; p < 0.001). Two hundred fifty‐nine of 704 younger patients undergoing THA (37%; 95% CI, 34.9%‐39.1%) returned to impact activity compared with 75 of 484 older patients undergoing THA (15.5%; 95% CI, 13.3%‐17.7%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Younger patients with OA are likely to return to high levels of activity after surgery, which may impact long‐term wear‐related implant survivorship. High activity levels are less common among younger patients with diagnoses other than OA. Age is not the ideal surrogate for activity level in patients considering THA; instead, specific activity‐level measures should be used when discussing patient expectations pertaining to postoperative activity levels after arthroplasty. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.