Does Microwave Ablation of the Tumor Edge Allow for Joint‐sparing Surgery in Patients With Osteosarcoma of the Proximal Tibia?. Issue 10 (October 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Jing; Guo, Zheng; Wang, Zhen; Fan, Hongbin; Fu, Jun
• Is Part Of: Clinical orthopaedics and related research. Volume 473:Issue 10(2015)
• Publication Date: 2015-10
• Subjects: Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Research -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Research -- Periodicals; Chirurgie orthopédique -- Périodiques; 616.7005
• DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4447-y
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0009-921X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Joint‐sparing surgery of a patient's native joint for osteosarcoma likely affords better function and comparable survival. However, it sometimes is challenging to resect a juxtaarticular osteosarcoma in a way that preserves the affected epiphysis because wide margins are necessary to minimize the risk of local recurrence. If there was a method to resect a tumor close to the joint and treat a potentially positive margin to prevent recurrence, it might allow salvage of a joint that otherwise might be lost. Questions/purposes: We therefore asked (1) whether joint‐preserving tumor resection could be performed for juxtaarticular osteosarcoma after microwave ablation of the tumor edge under navigation without leading to local recurrences, (2) what is the resulting function, and (3) what are the complications associated with this procedure. Methods: Between 2009 and 2011, we treated 11 patients who had juxtaarticular osteosarcoma of the proximal tibia (mean age, 12 years; range, 9‐16 years) with joint‐preserving surgery by transepiphysis tumor resection after navigation‐assisted microwave ablation of the tumor edge; they were followed a minimum of 37 months (mean, 48 months; range 37‐62 months), and none was lost to followup. Patients were considered eligible for this procedure if they had a distance from the tumor edge to the articular surface between 10 to 15 mm, good chemotherapy responses, no pathologic fracture and no tumor involvement of major neurovascular structures. Allograft in combination with a vascularized fibula flap was used for segmental reconstruction. We recorded local tumor control, complications, and functional outcomes using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score, which ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better function. Results: There were no local recurrences. Major complications included osteonecrosis of part of the epiphysis in two patients and deep infection in one. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score ranged from 26 to 30 with a mean of 29. Conclusions: In selected patients with osteosarcoma invading the epiphysis, navigated resection facilitates performing joint‐sparing surgery, and in our small series, the adjuvant microwave ablation seemed to provide adequate local tumor control. Although more experience and longer followup are needed, this approach may make it possible to salvage more native joints when performing limb salvage for osteosarcoma. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.