Secular citizens, pious MPs: why German attitudes about genetic testing are much more permissive than German laws. Issue 1 (1st January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Arzheimer, Kai
• Is Part Of: Political research exchange. Volume 2:Issue 1(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-01-01
• Subjects: PGD -- ART -- morality politics -- secularism -- Germany; Political science -- Periodicals; Political science; Periodicals; 320
• DOI: 10.1080/2474736X.2020.1765693
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2474-736X

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Germany has lifted its total ban on Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD, a form of genetic testing), but the new rules are still much stricter than those in other European countries. Results from a large-scale survey experiment show that the general population holds more permissive views on this bio-ethical question than lawmakers. In a country seen as a paradigm for the 'religious world' of morality politics, many citizens even support further liberalization along the lines of legislation in Belgium and the UK. Induced reflection on the arguments raised in parliament does not change this: arguments in favour of PGD are widely accepted by respondents, whereas many citizens reject the arguments against PGD. Citzens' and MPs' respective evaluations are affected strongly by religiosity, whose levels in the population are much lower than in parliament. Widespread secular views are not adequately represented in politics. This does not only concern the regulation of PGD but also other current and future bioethical issues. It is unlikely that this tension can be resolved through electoral politics. These findings have important ramifications not just for practical morality politics in Germany and other 'religious world' countries but also for the two worlds framework itself.