Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis. Issue 1 (2nd January 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis. Issue 1 (2nd January 2021)
- Main Title:
- Comparing oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis
- Authors:
- Moschini, Marco
Zamboni, Stefania
Afferi, Luca
Pradere, Benjamin
Abufaraj, Mohammad
Soria, Francesco
D'Andrea, David
Roupret, Morgan
De la Taille, Alexandre
Simeone, Claudio
Mattei, Agostino
Mathieu, Romain
Bensalah, Karim
Wirth, Manfred Peter
Montorsi, Francesco
Briganti, Alberto
Gallina, Andrea
Simone, Giuseppe
Gallucci, Michele
Di Bona, Carlo
Marra, Giancarlo
Mari, Andrea
Di Trapani, Ettore
Alvarez Maestro, Mario
Krajewski, Wojciech
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Xylinas, Evanguelos
Baumeister, Philipp - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: Objectives: To compare oncological outcomes of open (ORNU) and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) after controlling for preoperative patient-derived factors. Patients and methods: We evaluated a multi-institutional collaborative database composed of 3984 patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with RNU between 2006 and 2018. To adjust for potential selection bias, propensity score matching adjusted for age, gender and American society Anesthesiology (ASA) score was performed with one ORNU patient matched to one LRNU patient. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression evaluating the risk of overall recurrence, cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) in the overall population and after propensity matching were performed. Results: In total, 3984 patients underwent RNU, of these 3227 (81%) patients were treated with ORNU and 757 (19%) patients with LRNU. Within a median follow-up of 62 months, 1276 recurrences, 844 CSMs and 1128 OMs were recorded. On multivariable analyses, the LRNU approach was associated with an increased risk of overall recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.54; P = 0.02), but on the other hand LRNU was associated with a protective effect on CSM (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56–0.98; P = 0.04). After propensity matching analyses adjusted for age, gender and ASA score, 757 patients treated with LRNU and 757 patients treated with ORNU were available for the analyses. OnABSTRACT: Objectives: To compare oncological outcomes of open (ORNU) and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) after controlling for preoperative patient-derived factors. Patients and methods: We evaluated a multi-institutional collaborative database composed of 3984 patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with RNU between 2006 and 2018. To adjust for potential selection bias, propensity score matching adjusted for age, gender and American society Anesthesiology (ASA) score was performed with one ORNU patient matched to one LRNU patient. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression evaluating the risk of overall recurrence, cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) in the overall population and after propensity matching were performed. Results: In total, 3984 patients underwent RNU, of these 3227 (81%) patients were treated with ORNU and 757 (19%) patients with LRNU. Within a median follow-up of 62 months, 1276 recurrences, 844 CSMs and 1128 OMs were recorded. On multivariable analyses, the LRNU approach was associated with an increased risk of overall recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.54; P = 0.02), but on the other hand LRNU was associated with a protective effect on CSM (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56–0.98; P = 0.04). After propensity matching analyses adjusted for age, gender and ASA score, 757 patients treated with LRNU and 757 patients treated with ORNU were available for the analyses. On multivariable Cox regression, LRNU vs ORNU was not associated with any difference in overall recurrence ( P = 0.08), CSM ( P = 0.1) or OM ( P = 0.9). Conclusion: Our present data suggest that even if the type of approach to RNU was associated with different survival outcomes considering the overall population, this difference vanished when adjusted for potential confounders in propensity matching analyses. Therefore, we found that LRNU is not inferior to the ORNU approach for the treatment of UTUC. Abbreviations: ASA: American Society of Anesthesiology; CIS: carcinoma in situ ; CSM: cancer-specific mortality; HR: hazard ratio; IQR: interquartile range; LN: lymph node; LNI: lymph node invasion; LVI: lymphovascular invasion; OM: overall mortality; pT: pathological tumour stage; RCT: randomised controlled trial; (L)(O)RNU: (laparoscopic) (open) radical nephroureterectomy; UTUC: upper tract urothelial carcinoma … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Arab journal of urology. Volume 19:Issue 1(2021)
- Journal:
- Arab journal of urology
- Issue:
- Volume 19:Issue 1(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 19, Issue 1 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 19
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0019-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 31
- Page End:
- 36
- Publication Date:
- 2021-01-02
- Subjects:
- Upper tract urothelial carcinoma -- UTUC -- RNU -- laparoscopic -- radical nephroureterectomy -- open
Urology -- Periodicals
Urology
Urologic Diseases
Urologic Surgical Procedures
Urogenital Neoplasms
Arabia
Periodicals
616.6 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/2090598X ↗
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/2547/ ↗
https://tandfonline.com/action/showAxaArticles?journalCode=taju20 ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/2090598X.2020.1817720 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2090-598X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22793.xml