The influence of societal and organizational culture on the use of work-life balance programs: A comparative analysis of the United States and the Republic of Korea. Issue 1 (2nd January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Brown, Haidy; Kim, Ji Sung; Faerman, Sue R.
• Is Part Of: Social science journal. Volume 58:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 62
• Page End: 76
• Publication Date: 2021-01-02
• Subjects: Work-life balance -- Self-efficacy -- Societal culture -- Organizational culture; Social sciences -- Periodicals; 300.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2019.03.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0362-3319

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This research examines data from in-depth interviews with professional women in the U.S. and Korea to explore the underuse of work-life balance programs (WLBPs) in these two countries. Using thematic analysis, the study examines these women's perceptions of the influence of societal and organizational culture on their WLBP use. It also examines their beliefs that work-nonwork balance is achievable [labelled work-nonwork self-efficacy (WNSE)] as well as their perceptions of how societal and organizational cultures influence their WNSE. Overall, women in Korea spoke more strongly about the influence of societal culture on their WLBP use and WNSE, while women in the U.S. spoke more strongly about the influence of organizational culture. In particular, collectivism, power distance and gendered norms were strongly and consistently noted by interviewees from the Korean sample as factors influencing their WLBP use and WNSE. Alternatively, power distance, uncertainty avoidance and gendered norms were mentioned consistently by interviewees from the U.S. sample, but these women placed greater emphasis on organizational cultural elements as influencing their WNSE and WLBP use. Using a general organizational culture framework (rather than focusing specifically on family-friendly/family-supportive culture), the study found several specific elements of organizational culture that were perceived as influencing women's WLBP use and WNSE in both countries. While much literature focuses on the potential positive impact of WLBP use on women's work-nonwork balance, we found that many women did not believe that work-nonwork balance would be achievable through WLBP use and so did not use these programs. Study findings suggest additional research that examines societal and organizational culture simultaneously is needed.