A Pragmatic Approach to Psychometric Comparisons between the DSM-IV and DSM-5 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklists in Acutely Injured Trauma Patients. Issue 4 (1st October 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Pragmatic Approach to Psychometric Comparisons between the DSM-IV and DSM-5 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklists in Acutely Injured Trauma Patients. Issue 4 (1st October 2020)
- Main Title:
- A Pragmatic Approach to Psychometric Comparisons between the DSM-IV and DSM-5 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklists in Acutely Injured Trauma Patients
- Authors:
- Moodliar, Rddhi
Russo, Joan
Bedard-Gilligan, Michele
Moloney, Kathleen
Johnson, Peyton
Seo, Sara
Vaziri, Natalie
Zatzick, Douglas - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective : Prior investigations suggest the relative equivalence of the DSM-IV and DSM-5 versions of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorders (PTSD) Checklist, yet no investigations have assessed the psychometric properties of the scales in pragmatic trials of acutely injured trauma survivors. Method : DSM-IV and DSM-5 versions of the PTSD Checklist were included in follow-up interviews of physically injured patients enrolled longitudinally in a pragmatic clinical trial; pragmatic trials aim to efficiently implement research procedures to inform healthcare system policy changes. Psychometric comparisons of the DSM-IV, DSM-5, and a 20-item blended version of the scale included evaluations of internal consistency, correlational assessments, evaluation of item level agreements, and estimation of DSM-5 cutoffs that optimize electronic health record screening protocols. Results : 128 patients were included in the pragmatic psychometric study. Cronbach's alphas for the 3 versions of the PTSD Checklist ranged from 0.93 to 0.95. Correlations between the 3 scales ranged from 0.79 to 0.99. All 3 measures demonstrated excellent convergent and discriminant properties. Item level agreement ranged from 70-80%. For the DSM-5 and blended versions of the scale, a score of 30 and 24, respectively, best approximated the DSM-IV cutoff of ≥35 that had previously optimized PTSD detection in conjunction with EHR screening. Conclusions : Among injured trauma survivors, the psychometricAbstract : Objective : Prior investigations suggest the relative equivalence of the DSM-IV and DSM-5 versions of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorders (PTSD) Checklist, yet no investigations have assessed the psychometric properties of the scales in pragmatic trials of acutely injured trauma survivors. Method : DSM-IV and DSM-5 versions of the PTSD Checklist were included in follow-up interviews of physically injured patients enrolled longitudinally in a pragmatic clinical trial; pragmatic trials aim to efficiently implement research procedures to inform healthcare system policy changes. Psychometric comparisons of the DSM-IV, DSM-5, and a 20-item blended version of the scale included evaluations of internal consistency, correlational assessments, evaluation of item level agreements, and estimation of DSM-5 cutoffs that optimize electronic health record screening protocols. Results : 128 patients were included in the pragmatic psychometric study. Cronbach's alphas for the 3 versions of the PTSD Checklist ranged from 0.93 to 0.95. Correlations between the 3 scales ranged from 0.79 to 0.99. All 3 measures demonstrated excellent convergent and discriminant properties. Item level agreement ranged from 70-80%. For the DSM-5 and blended versions of the scale, a score of 30 and 24, respectively, best approximated the DSM-IV cutoff of ≥35 that had previously optimized PTSD detection in conjunction with EHR screening. Conclusions : Among injured trauma survivors, the psychometric performance of the DSM-IV PTSD Checklist with the addition of the 4 new DSM-5 PTSD Checklist items is nearly equivalent to the DSM-5 PTSD Checklist. The investigation also suggests that pragmatic psychometric methods can catalyze the rapid translation of research findings into real-world practice settings. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Psychiatry. Volume 83:Issue 4(2020)
- Journal:
- Psychiatry
- Issue:
- Volume 83:Issue 4(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 83, Issue 4 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 83
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0083-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 390
- Page End:
- 401
- Publication Date:
- 2020-10-01
- Subjects:
- Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Psychiatry
Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Periodicals
616.89 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/upsy20#.VcNnKvlVhBc ↗
http://guilfordjournals.com/loi/psyc ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0033-2747;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.guilford.com/cgi-bin/cartscript.cgi?page=pr/jnps.htm&dir=periodicals/per_psych&cart_id= ↗
http://www.extenza-eps.com/extenza/contentviewing/viewJournal.do?journalId=167 ↗
http://www.guilford.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/00332747.2020.1762396 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0033-2747
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6946.260000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22754.xml