Use of broad consent and related procedures in genomics research: Perspectives from research participants in the Genetics of Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHDGen) study in a University Teaching Hospital in Zambia. Issue 1 (1st January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Use of broad consent and related procedures in genomics research: Perspectives from research participants in the Genetics of Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHDGen) study in a University Teaching Hospital in Zambia. Issue 1 (1st January 2020)
- Main Title:
- Use of broad consent and related procedures in genomics research: Perspectives from research participants in the Genetics of Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHDGen) study in a University Teaching Hospital in Zambia
- Authors:
- Mweemba, Oliver
Musuku, John
Mayosi, Bongani M.
Parker, Michael
Rutakumwa, Rwamahe
Seeley, Janet
Tindana, Paulina
De Vries, Jantina - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: The use of broad consent for genomics research raises important ethical questions for the conduct of genomics research, including relating to its acceptability to research participants and comprehension of difficult scientific concepts. To explore these and other challenges, we conducted a study using qualitative methods with participants enrolled in an H3Africa Rheumatic Heart Disease genomics study (the RHDGen network) in Zambia to explore their views on broad consent, sample and data sharing and secondary use. In-depth interviews were conducted with RHDGen participants ( n = 18), study staff ( n = 5) and with individuals who refused to participate ( n = 3). In general, broad consent was seen to be reasonable if reasons for storing the samples for future research use were disclosed. Some felt that broad consent should be restricted by specifying planned future studies and that secondary research should ideally relate to original disease for which samples were collected. A few participants felt that broad consent would delay the return of research results to participants. This study echoes findings in other similar studies in other parts of the continent that suggested that broad consent could be an acceptable consent model in Africa if careful thought is given to restrictions on re-use.
- Is Part Of:
- Global bioethics. Volume 31:Issue 1(2020)
- Journal:
- Global bioethics
- Issue:
- Volume 31:Issue 1(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 31, Issue 1 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 31
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0031-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 184
- Page End:
- 199
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01-01
- Subjects:
- H3Africa -- broad consent -- genomics -- bio-banking -- Zambia
Bioethics -- Periodicals
Medical ethics -- Periodicals
Bioethics
Medical ethics
Periodicals
174.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rgbe20/26/2 ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/11287462.2019.1592868 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1128-7462
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22723.xml