Restrictions on Reproductive Care at Catholic Hospitals: A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences and Perspectives. Issue 4 (16th September 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Restrictions on Reproductive Care at Catholic Hospitals: A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences and Perspectives. Issue 4 (16th September 2020)
- Main Title:
- Restrictions on Reproductive Care at Catholic Hospitals: A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences and Perspectives
- Authors:
- Wascher, Jocelyn M.
Stulberg, Debra B.
Freedman, Lori R. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Previous studies have shown that many women who would seek care at Catholic hospitals are unaware of the hospital's religious affiliation. Furthermore, women often do not realize that these institutions operate according to religious beliefs that restrict access to certain reproductive services. Our study aimed to gain patient perspectives on experiences seeking reproductive care at religiously affiliated institutions. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth interviews with 33 women who reported experiences seeking reproductive services at Catholic hospitals. Interview questions focused on women's experiences with religious restrictions, their attitudes towards religious healthcare, and whether and how they think women should be informed of these restrictions. Interviews were thematically analyzed using Dedoose software, applying both a priori concepts such as patient autonomy, informed decision making, and transparency, as well as new concepts that emerged from the data or denoted unanticipated distinctions within codes. Results: In this paper, we present three findings. First, women value both patient autonomy and hospital religious freedom. Struggling to reconcile these, many blamed themselves for not anticipating religious restrictions. Second, barriers to information prevent women from researching restrictions ahead of time. Third, women would like more information about these restrictions from both doctors and hospitals.Abstract: Background: Previous studies have shown that many women who would seek care at Catholic hospitals are unaware of the hospital's religious affiliation. Furthermore, women often do not realize that these institutions operate according to religious beliefs that restrict access to certain reproductive services. Our study aimed to gain patient perspectives on experiences seeking reproductive care at religiously affiliated institutions. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth interviews with 33 women who reported experiences seeking reproductive services at Catholic hospitals. Interview questions focused on women's experiences with religious restrictions, their attitudes towards religious healthcare, and whether and how they think women should be informed of these restrictions. Interviews were thematically analyzed using Dedoose software, applying both a priori concepts such as patient autonomy, informed decision making, and transparency, as well as new concepts that emerged from the data or denoted unanticipated distinctions within codes. Results: In this paper, we present three findings. First, women value both patient autonomy and hospital religious freedom. Struggling to reconcile these, many blamed themselves for not anticipating religious restrictions. Second, barriers to information prevent women from researching restrictions ahead of time. Third, women would like more information about these restrictions from both doctors and hospitals. Conclusion: Public policy that regulates hospitals should require transparency from hospitals and physicians about religious restrictions on care. Informing the public about religious policies and how they affect reproductive care will allow patients to better anticipate differences and make informed decisions about where to seek care. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- AJOB empirical bioethics. Volume 11:Issue 4(2020)
- Journal:
- AJOB empirical bioethics
- Issue:
- Volume 11:Issue 4(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 11, Issue 4 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 11
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0011-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 257
- Page End:
- 267
- Publication Date:
- 2020-09-16
- Subjects:
- Religion and medicine -- reproductive health -- bioethics -- qualitative research -- health policy -- conscientious objection
Bioethics -- Periodicals
Bioethics -- Research -- Periodicals
Bioethics -- Methodology -- Periodicals
Medical ethics -- Periodicals
174.205 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uabr20 ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/23294515.2020.1817173 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2329-4515
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0785.507260
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22723.xml