Clinical benefits of a swallowing intervention for esophageal cancer patients after esophagectomy. Issue 5 (29th October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Takatsu, Jun; Higaki, Eiji; Hosoi, Takahiro; Yoshida, Masahiro; Yamamoto, Masahiko; Abe, Tetsuya; Shimizu, Yasuhiro
• Is Part Of: Diseases of the esophagus. Volume 34:Issue 5(2021)
• Publication Date: 2020-10-29
• Subjects: esophagectomy -- dysphagia -- perioperative period -- enhanced recovery after surgery -- swallowing intervention; Esophagus -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.32
• DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa094
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1120-8694

Abstract

Summary: Dysphagia after esophagectomy is the main cause of a prolonged postoperative stay. The present study investigated the effects of a swallowing intervention led by a speech–language–hearing therapist (SLHT) on postoperative dysphagia. We enrolled 276 consecutive esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastric anastomosis between July 2015 and December 2018; 109 received standard care (control group) and 167 were treated by a swallowing intervention (intervention group). In the intervention group, swallowing function screening and rehabilitation based on each patient's dysfunction were led by SLHT. The start of oral intake, length of oral intake rehabilitation, and length of the postoperative stay were compared in the two groups. The patient's subgroups in the 276 patients were examined to clarify the more effectiveness of the intervention. The start of oral intake was significantly earlier in the intervention group (POD: 11 vs. 8 days; P = 0.009). In the subgroup analysis, the length of the postoperative stay was also significantly shortened by the swallowing intervention in patients without complications (POD: 18 vs. 14 days; P = 0.001) and with recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP) (POD: 30 vs. 21.5 days; P = 0.003). A multivariate regression analysis identified the swallowing intervention as a significant independent factor for the earlier start of oral intake and a shorter postoperative stay in patients without complications and with RLNP. Our proposed swallowing intervention is beneficial for the earlier start of oral intake and discharge after esophagectomy, particularly in patients without complications and with RLNP. This program may contribute to enhanced recovery after surgery.