Conspecific attraction for conservation and management of terrestrial breeding birds: Current knowledge and future research directions. Issue 2 (9th April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Valente, Jonathon J; LeGrande-Rolls, Christa L; Rivers, James W; Tucker, Anna M; Fischer, Richard A; Betts, Matthew G
• Is Part Of: Ornithological applications. Volume 123:Issue 2(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-04-09
• Subjects: breeding birds -- conspecific attraction -- experimental manipulation -- habitat selection -- meta-analysis -- performance information -- social information; atracción conespecífica -- aves reproductivas -- información de desempeño -- información social -- manipulación experimental -- meta-análisis -- selección de hábitat; Birds -- Periodicals; Birds -- California -- Periodicals; Ornithology -- Periodicals; 598
• DOI: 10.1093/ornithapp/duab007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2732-4621

Abstract

Abstract: Conspecific presence can indicate the location or quality of resources, and animals settling near conspecifics often gain fitness benefits. This can result in adaptive conspecific attraction during breeding habitat selection as demonstrated in numerous terrestrial, territorial birds. There is growing interest in using simulated conspecific social cues (e.g., decoys, broadcasted vocalizations) to manage bird distributions, yet it remains unclear when this approach is likely to succeed. We reviewed published studies to evaluate whether the strength of conspecific attraction in terrestrial birds is mediated by characteristics of species (life history traits), simulated cues (e.g., timing and duration), sites (e.g., quality), and how conspecific attraction was measured. We identified 31 experiments that simulated social cues and compared conspecific settlement between treatment and control sites. We then used phylogenetically controlled meta-regression to assess the impacts of 19 moderators on settlement. Nearly all species included in these experiments were migratory passerines, and social cues generally had a strong, positive influence on their settlement decisions, as the odds of site occupancy were 3.12× (95% CI: 0.81–11.69) greater in treatment sites relative to control sites. Within this group, conspecific attraction was evolutionarily conserved with ≥25.5% (95% CI: 5.1%–65.4%) of the variance in treatment effects explained by phylogenetic relatedness. However, we found no evidence that any covariates influenced the response to social cues, and we posit this stems from limited research specifically designed to identify the mechanisms mediating conspecific attraction. We therefore developed a research agenda that provides a framework for testing mechanistic hypotheses regarding how cue characteristics, species traits, and spatial contexts may mediate attraction to conspecifics. Evaluating these hypotheses will greatly advance the field by helping managers understand when, where, and why simulating social cues can be used to enhance populations of species that are of conservation concern. Lay Summary: Simulating the presence of terrestrial birds often attracts breeders of the same species, though how this varies among species, simulated cues, or locations remains unknown. We reviewed 31 experiments that examined conspecific attraction to simulated social cues in terrestrial breeding birds and tested the effects of 19 variables on attraction. These experiments, which focused primarily on migratory songbirds, revealed strong effects of simulated presence on settlement rates, but no strong evidence that any other variables affected settlement rate. Simulating social cues such as vocalizations could be useful for managers interested in attracting migratory songbirds, although whether this extends to other terrestrial species remains unknown. A greater understanding of how and where to use this technique will improve its utility as a tool for enhancing populations of species of conservation concern. Graphical Abstract: