Can the Renewable Portfolio Standards improve social welfare in China's electricity market?. (May 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Can the Renewable Portfolio Standards improve social welfare in China's electricity market?. (May 2021)
- Main Title:
- Can the Renewable Portfolio Standards improve social welfare in China's electricity market?
- Authors:
- Ying, Zhou
Xin-gang, Zhao
Xue-feng, Jia
Zhen, Wang - Abstract:
- Abstract: Renewable portfolio standards (RPS) is an institutional change from Feed-in Tariff (FIT) to government policy and market mechanism. Is it conducive to improve China's social welfare? Given this problem, this paper constructs the social welfare function under the FIT policy and RPS system respectively based on consumer heterogeneity and simulates the social welfare of China under the two schemes on the basis of combining the real economic situation of China. The results show that: (1) Based on China's real economic situation, the implementation of RPS has achieved Pareto improvement and improves China's social welfare. (2) Under the RPS, compared with the actual situation of oligopoly in China's electricity market, competition can improve social welfare better. (3) The effective implementation of RPS depends on the quota level of the government's scientific design. As far as China's current real economic situation is concerned, when the quota is set in the interval (0, 0.5], the social welfare under the RPS is always higher than that under the FIT. Therefore, to improve social welfare and promote low-carbon energy transition, China should effectively promote the implementation of RPS, a mandatory institutional change, and strengthen the system construction of RPS. Highlights: Implementing the RPS can improve the social welfare of China's electricity market. Under the RPS system, competition is conducive to improving China's social welfare. The factor of consumerAbstract: Renewable portfolio standards (RPS) is an institutional change from Feed-in Tariff (FIT) to government policy and market mechanism. Is it conducive to improve China's social welfare? Given this problem, this paper constructs the social welfare function under the FIT policy and RPS system respectively based on consumer heterogeneity and simulates the social welfare of China under the two schemes on the basis of combining the real economic situation of China. The results show that: (1) Based on China's real economic situation, the implementation of RPS has achieved Pareto improvement and improves China's social welfare. (2) Under the RPS, compared with the actual situation of oligopoly in China's electricity market, competition can improve social welfare better. (3) The effective implementation of RPS depends on the quota level of the government's scientific design. As far as China's current real economic situation is concerned, when the quota is set in the interval (0, 0.5], the social welfare under the RPS is always higher than that under the FIT. Therefore, to improve social welfare and promote low-carbon energy transition, China should effectively promote the implementation of RPS, a mandatory institutional change, and strengthen the system construction of RPS. Highlights: Implementing the RPS can improve the social welfare of China's electricity market. Under the RPS system, competition is conducive to improving China's social welfare. The factor of consumer heterogeneity is considered in this paper. Improved the social welfare formula which is more suited for China's power market. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Energy policy. Volume 152(2021)
- Journal:
- Energy policy
- Issue:
- Volume 152(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 152, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 152
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0152-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-05
- Subjects:
- Feed-in tariff -- Renewable portfolio standards -- Tradable green certificate -- Social welfare -- China
Energy policy -- Periodicals
Politique énergétique -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
333.79 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03014215 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112242 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0301-4215
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3747.720000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22685.xml