Comparison of molecular testing strategies for COVID-19 control: a mathematical modelling study. Issue 12 (December 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of molecular testing strategies for COVID-19 control: a mathematical modelling study. Issue 12 (December 2020)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of molecular testing strategies for COVID-19 control: a mathematical modelling study
- Authors:
- Grassly, Nicholas C
Pons-Salort, Margarita
Parker, Edward P K
White, Peter J
Ferguson, Neil M
Ainslie, Kylie
Baguelin, Marc
Bhatt, Samir
Boonyasiri, Adhiratha
Brazeau, Nick
Cattarino, Lorenzo
Coupland, Helen
Cucunuba, Zulma
Cuomo-Dannenburg, Gina
Dighe, Amy
Donnelly, Christl
van Elsland, Sabine L
FitzJohn, Richard
Flaxman, Seth
Fraser, Keith
Gaythorpe, Katy
Green, Will
Hamlet, Arran
Hinsley, Wes
Imai, Natsuko
Knock, Edward
Laydon, Daniel
Mellan, Thomas
Mishra, Swapnil
Nedjati-Gilani, Gemma
Nouvellet, Pierre
Okell, Lucy
Ragonnet-Cronin, Manon
Thompson, Hayley A
Unwin, H. Juliette T
Vollmer, Michaela
Volz, Erik
Walters, Caroline
Wang, Yuanrong
Watson, Oliver J
Whittaker, Charles
Whittles, Lilith
Xi, Xiaoyue
… (more) - Abstract:
- Summary: Background: WHO has called for increased testing in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, but countries have taken different approaches and the effectiveness of alternative strategies is unknown. We aimed to investigate the potential impact of different testing and isolation strategies on transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Methods: We developed a mathematical model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission based on infectiousness and PCR test sensitivity over time since infection. We estimated the reduction in the effective reproduction number ( R ) achieved by testing and isolating symptomatic individuals, regular screening of high-risk groups irrespective of symptoms, and quarantine of contacts of laboratory-confirmed cases identified through test-and-trace protocols. The expected effectiveness of different testing strategies was defined as the percentage reduction in R . We reviewed data on the performance of antibody tests reported by the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics and examined their implications for the use of so-called immunity passports. Findings: If all individuals with symptoms compatible with COVID-19 self-isolated and self-isolation was 100% effective in reducing onwards transmission, self-isolation of symptomatic individuals would result in a reduction in R of 47% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 32–55). PCR testing to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection soon after symptom onset could reduce the number of individualsSummary: Background: WHO has called for increased testing in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, but countries have taken different approaches and the effectiveness of alternative strategies is unknown. We aimed to investigate the potential impact of different testing and isolation strategies on transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Methods: We developed a mathematical model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission based on infectiousness and PCR test sensitivity over time since infection. We estimated the reduction in the effective reproduction number ( R ) achieved by testing and isolating symptomatic individuals, regular screening of high-risk groups irrespective of symptoms, and quarantine of contacts of laboratory-confirmed cases identified through test-and-trace protocols. The expected effectiveness of different testing strategies was defined as the percentage reduction in R . We reviewed data on the performance of antibody tests reported by the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics and examined their implications for the use of so-called immunity passports. Findings: If all individuals with symptoms compatible with COVID-19 self-isolated and self-isolation was 100% effective in reducing onwards transmission, self-isolation of symptomatic individuals would result in a reduction in R of 47% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 32–55). PCR testing to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection soon after symptom onset could reduce the number of individuals needing to self-isolate, but would also reduce the effectiveness of self-isolation (around 10% would be false negatives). Weekly screening of health-care workers and other high-risk groups irrespective of symptoms by use of PCR testing is estimated to reduce their contribution to SARS-CoV-2 transmission by 23% (95% UI 16–40), on top of reductions achieved by self-isolation following symptoms, assuming results are available at 24 h. The effectiveness of test and trace depends strongly on coverage and the timeliness of contact tracing, potentially reducing R by 26% (95% UI 14–35) on top of reductions achieved by self-isolation following symptoms, if 80% of cases and contacts are identified and there is immediate testing following symptom onset and quarantine of contacts within 24 h. Among currently available antibody tests, performance has been highly variable, with specificity around 90% or lower for rapid diagnostic tests and 95–99% for laboratory-based ELISA and chemiluminescent assays. Interpretation: Molecular testing can play an important role in prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, especially among health-care workers and other high-risk groups, but no single strategy will reduce R below 1 at current levels of population immunity. Immunity passports based on antibody tests or tests for infection face substantial technical, legal, and ethical challenges. Funding: UK Medical Research Council. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Lancet infectious diseases. Volume 20:Issue 12(2020)
- Journal:
- Lancet infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 20:Issue 12(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 20, Issue 12 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0020-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- 1381
- Page End:
- 1389
- Publication Date:
- 2020-12
- Subjects:
- Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
Infection -- Periodicals
Communicable Diseases -- Periodicals
Infection -- Periodicals
Maladies infectieuses -- Périodiques
Infection -- Périodiques
Communicable diseases
Infection
Periodicals
616.905 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.mdconsult.com/public/search?search_type=journal&j_sort=pub_date&j_issn=1473-3099 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14733099 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30630-7 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1473-3099
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5146.082000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22695.xml