Early psychological intervention following recent trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue 1 (31st December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Roberts, Neil P.; Kitchiner, Neil J.; Kenardy, Justin; Lewis, Catrin E.; Bisson, Jonathan I.
• Is Part Of: European journal of psychotraumatology. Volume 10:Issue 1(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-12-31
• Subjects: Post-traumatic stress disorder -- psychological intervention -- early intervention -- prevention -- systematic review -- meta-analysis; Trastorno de estres postraumático -- intervencion psicológica -- intervención temprana -- prevención -- Revisión Sistemática -- meta-análisis; 创伤后应激障碍 -- 心理干预 -- 早期干预 -- 预防 -- 系统综述 -- 元分析; Post-traumatic stress disorder -- Periodicals; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Post-traumatic stress disorder; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; 616.8521
• DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1695486
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2000-8198

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background : Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a common and debilitating disorder which has a significant impact on the lives of sufferers. A number of early psychological interventions have been developed to try to prevent chronic difficulties. Objective : The objective of this study was to establish the current evidence for the effectiveness of multiple session early psychological interventions aimed at preventing or treating traumatic stress symptoms beginning within three months of trauma exposure. Methods : Randomized controlled trials of early multiple session psychological interventions aimed at preventing or reducing traumatic stress symptoms of individuals exposed to a traumatic event, fulfiling trauma criteria for an ICD or DSM diagnosis of PTSD were identified through a search of the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Group Clinical Trials Registers database, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and PILOTS. Two authors independently extracted study details and data and completed risk of bias assessments. Analyses were undertaken using Review Manager software. Quality of findings were rated according to 'Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation' (GRADE) and appraised for clinical importance. Results : Sixty-one studies evaluating a variety of interventions were identified. For individuals exposed to a trauma who were not pre-screened for traumatic stress symptoms there were no clinically important differences between any intervention and usual care. For individuals reporting traumatic stress symptoms we found clinically important evidence of benefits for trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT-T), cognitive therapy without exposure and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). Differences were greatest for those diagnosed with acute stress disorder (ASD) and PTSD. Conclusions : There is evidence for the effectiveness of several early psychological interventions for individuals with traumatic stress symptoms following trauma exposure, especially for those meeting the diagnostic threshold for ASD or PTSD. Evidence is strongest for trauma-focused CBT. HIGHLIGHTS: We found no clinically important evidence for the benefit of early intervention offered to all individuals exposed to a traumatic event, regardless of symptomatology. There was evidence of a clinically important effect for trauma-focused CBT (CBT-T), brief EMDR and cognitive therapy without exposure. Evidence was strongest for CBT-T.