The immunophenotypic characteristics and flow cytometric scoring system of acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21) (q22;q22); RUNX1‐RUNX1T1. (27th September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shang, Lei; Chen, Xuejing; liu, Yan; Cai, Xiaojin; Shi, Yin; Shi, Lihui; Li, Yuanyuan; Song, Zhen; Zheng, Bin; Sun, Wanchen; Ru, Kun; Mi, Yingchang; Wang, Jianxiang; Wang, Huijun
• Is Part Of: International journal of laboratory hematology. Volume 41:Number 1(2019:Feb.)
• Page Start: 23
• Page End: 31
• Publication Date: 2018-09-27
• Subjects: acute myeloid leukemia -- flow cytometric scoring system -- immunophenotype -- RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 -- t(8; 21); Hematology -- Periodicals; Blood -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Hematology -- Periodicals; 616.15005
• DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12916
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1751-5521

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The translocation t(8;21) is one of the most frequent chromosome translocations in AML. Molecular (cyto)genetics is regarded as the gold standard for diagnosis. However, due to the complicated variety of AML‐related genetic abnormalities, comprehensive screening for all of these abnormalities may not be cost‐effective. Therefore, a flow cytometric (FC) scoring system was generated in this study for rapid screening and diagnosis of t(8;21)AML. Methods: The immunophenotypic characteristics of leukemic cells and neutrophils in cases with t(8;21) AML or other subtypes of AML were analyzed to find a method for the flow diagnosis of t(8;21) AML. Results: In this study, we picked six FC features pointing to the diagnosis of t(8;21) AML: The blasts show high‐intensity expression of CD34; aberrant expression of CD19, cCD79a, and CD56 in myeloblasts; co‐expression of CD56 in neutrophils, especially in immature neutrophils; and a maturity disturbance in granulocytes. A six‐point score was devised using these features. By ROC analysis, the AUC was 0.952, and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 0.86, 0.90. 0.91, and 0.84 when the score was ≥3 points. The score was then prospectively validated on an independent cohort, and the AUC of the ROC curve for the validation cohort was 0.975. When the cutoff value was set at 3, the obtained sensitivity and specificity values were 0.91 and 0.94, respectively. Conclusions: The FC score described can be used for the identification and rapid screening of t(8;21) AML.