Manufacturing worker perceptions of using wearable inertial sensors for multiple work shifts. (January 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Manufacturing worker perceptions of using wearable inertial sensors for multiple work shifts. (January 2022)
- Main Title:
- Manufacturing worker perceptions of using wearable inertial sensors for multiple work shifts
- Authors:
- Zhang, Xuanxuan
Schall, Mark C
Chen, Howard
Gallagher, Sean
Davis, Gerard A.
Sesek, Richard - Abstract:
- Abstract: Wearable inertial sensors may be used to objectively quantify exposure to some physical risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders. However, concerns regarding their potential negative effects on user safety and satisfaction remain. This study characterized the self-reported daily discomfort, distraction, and burden associated with wearing inertial sensors on the upper arms, trunk, and dominant wrist of 31 manufacturing workers collected over 15 full work shifts. Results indicated that the workers considered the devices as generally comfortable to wear, not distracting, and not burdensome to use. Exposure to non-neutral postures (discomfort, right arm, beta = 0.02; trunk, beta = −0.01), non-cyclic tasks (distraction, beta = -0.26), and higher body mass indices (discomfort, beta = 0.05; distraction, beta = 0.02) contributed to statistically significant ( p < 0.05), albeit practically small increases in undesirable ratings. For instance, for each additional percentage of time working with the right arm elevated ≥60°, self-reported discomfort ratings increased 0.02 cm on a standard 10 cm visual analog scale. Female workers reported less discomfort and distraction while wearing the sensors at work than males (discomfort, beta = −0.93; distraction, beta = −0.3). In general, the low ratings of discomfort, distraction, and burden associated with wearing the devices during work suggests that inertial sensors may be suitable for extended use among manufacturingAbstract: Wearable inertial sensors may be used to objectively quantify exposure to some physical risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders. However, concerns regarding their potential negative effects on user safety and satisfaction remain. This study characterized the self-reported daily discomfort, distraction, and burden associated with wearing inertial sensors on the upper arms, trunk, and dominant wrist of 31 manufacturing workers collected over 15 full work shifts. Results indicated that the workers considered the devices as generally comfortable to wear, not distracting, and not burdensome to use. Exposure to non-neutral postures (discomfort, right arm, beta = 0.02; trunk, beta = −0.01), non-cyclic tasks (distraction, beta = -0.26), and higher body mass indices (discomfort, beta = 0.05; distraction, beta = 0.02) contributed to statistically significant ( p < 0.05), albeit practically small increases in undesirable ratings. For instance, for each additional percentage of time working with the right arm elevated ≥60°, self-reported discomfort ratings increased 0.02 cm on a standard 10 cm visual analog scale. Female workers reported less discomfort and distraction while wearing the sensors at work than males (discomfort, beta = −0.93; distraction, beta = −0.3). In general, the low ratings of discomfort, distraction, and burden associated with wearing the devices during work suggests that inertial sensors may be suitable for extended use among manufacturing workers. Highlights: Thirty-one manufacturing workers wore wearable inertial sensors for 15 days. Discomfort, distraction, and burden were reported at the end of each shift. The sensors were generally considered comfortable to wear, not distracting, and not burdensome. Practically small increases in undesirable ratings were associated with some kinematic measures and BMI. Females reported less discomfort and distraction than males. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Applied ergonomics. Volume 98(2022)
- Journal:
- Applied ergonomics
- Issue:
- Volume 98(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 98, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 98
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0098-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-01
- Subjects:
- Wearables -- User experience -- Musculoskeletal disorders -- Inertial Measurement Unit -- Exposure assessment -- Field measurement
Human engineering -- Periodicals
620.82 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00036870 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103579 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-6870
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1572.500000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22677.xml