Adaptive Athlete Training Plan Generation: An intelligent control systems approach. Issue 4 (April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Connor, Mark; Beato, Marco; O'Neill, Michael
• Is Part Of: Journal of science and medicine in sport. Volume 25:Issue 4(2022)
• Page Start: 351
• Page End: 355
• Publication Date: 2022-04
• Subjects: Training load -- Planning -- Decision support -- Evolutionary computation -- Artificial intelligence -- Control systems; Sports sciences -- Periodicals; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Exercise -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Sports -- physiology -- Periodicals; Sports Medicine -- Periodicals; Sportgeneeskunde; 617.102705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.10.011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1440-2440

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: The planning and control of team sport training activities is an extremely important aspect of athletic development and team performance. This research introduces a novel system which leverages techniques from the fields of control system theory and artificial intelligence to construct optimal future training plans when unexpected disturbances and deviations from a training plan goal occur. Design: Simulation-based experimental design. Methods: The adaptation of training load prescriptions was formulated as an optimal control problem where we seek to minimize the difference between a desired training plan goal and an observed training outcome. To determine the most suitable approach to optimize future training loads the performance of an artificial intelligence-based feedback controller was compared to random and proportional controllers. Computational simulations (N = 1800) were conducted using a non-linear training plan spanning 60 days over a 12-week period, and the control strategies were assessed on their ability to adapt future training loads when disturbances and deviations from an optimal planning policy have occurred. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine if significant differences existed between the three control strategies. Results: The results of a repeated measures analysis of variance demonstrated that an intelligent feedback controller significantly outperforms the random (p < .001, ES = 7.41, very large) and proportional control (p < .001, ES = 7.41, very large) strategies at reducing the deviations from a training plan goal. Conclusions: This system can be used to support the decision making of practitioners across several areas considered important for the effective planning and adaption of athletic training.