Policy delivery gaps in the land-based flood risk management in China: A wider partnership is needed. Issue 116 (February 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Policy delivery gaps in the land-based flood risk management in China: A wider partnership is needed. Issue 116 (February 2021)
- Main Title:
- Policy delivery gaps in the land-based flood risk management in China: A wider partnership is needed
- Authors:
- Du, Shiqiang
Shen, Ju
Fang, Jian
Fang, Jiayi
Liu, Wei
Wen, Jiahong
Huang, Xiaoxuan
Chen, Sixin - Abstract:
- Highlights: Flood detention zones (FDZ) can temporarily store extra floodwaters and reduce risk. Conflicts emerge as population growth renders the FDZ use difficult. Policy addresses the conflicts through massive relocation, adaptive farming, and giving "Room for the River". Mixed methods shows that information and financial gaps reduce the policy feasibility. Proposed solutions includes a public-private partnership involving FDZ service payment. Abstract: Land resources can accommodate extra floodwaters, thus playing an important role in integrated flood risk management (FRM). However, potential conflicts emerge as the lands that are used as temporal room for floodwaters are also home to human beings, which is common in the flood detention zones (FDZs) in China. To date, little is known about how Chinese policies address the conflicts and how local stakeholders perceive the policies. This paper aims to address this research gap using a case study of the FDZs in the middle Huaihe River, China. A mixed method is applied including an official document survey, a multi-layer interview (15 respondents), and questionnaires (123 respondents). We find that three major strategies are employed to enhance the flood detention function and reduce flood risk inside the FDZs: 1) returning parts of the FDZs to rivers; 2) flood-adaptive farming; and 3) reducing population density via a massive relocation. However, the local residents have a low engagement willingness, which are associatedHighlights: Flood detention zones (FDZ) can temporarily store extra floodwaters and reduce risk. Conflicts emerge as population growth renders the FDZ use difficult. Policy addresses the conflicts through massive relocation, adaptive farming, and giving "Room for the River". Mixed methods shows that information and financial gaps reduce the policy feasibility. Proposed solutions includes a public-private partnership involving FDZ service payment. Abstract: Land resources can accommodate extra floodwaters, thus playing an important role in integrated flood risk management (FRM). However, potential conflicts emerge as the lands that are used as temporal room for floodwaters are also home to human beings, which is common in the flood detention zones (FDZs) in China. To date, little is known about how Chinese policies address the conflicts and how local stakeholders perceive the policies. This paper aims to address this research gap using a case study of the FDZs in the middle Huaihe River, China. A mixed method is applied including an official document survey, a multi-layer interview (15 respondents), and questionnaires (123 respondents). We find that three major strategies are employed to enhance the flood detention function and reduce flood risk inside the FDZs: 1) returning parts of the FDZs to rivers; 2) flood-adaptive farming; and 3) reducing population density via a massive relocation. However, the local residents have a low engagement willingness, which are associated with a poor perception of the policies and a lack of short-term economic attractiveness. Policy delivery gaps thus exist. Information sharing should be enhanced to encourage public participation. A public-private partnership involving more social and financial resources, particularly including the downstream beneficiaries, could help to increase the policy's economic feasibility. The findings can enrich a policy shift toward a more land-based FRM, particularly in developing countries. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Environmental science & policy. Issue 116(2021)
- Journal:
- Environmental science & policy
- Issue:
- Issue 116(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 116, Issue 116 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 116
- Issue:
- 116
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0116-0116-0000
- Page Start:
- 128
- Page End:
- 135
- Publication Date:
- 2021-02
- Subjects:
- Flood -- Plain restoration -- Land use -- Nature-based solutions -- Flood detention zone -- Risk migration
Environmental policy -- Periodicals
Environmental sciences -- Periodicals
Environnement -- Politique gouvernementale -- Périodiques
Sciences de l'environnement -- Périodiques
Environmental policy
Environmental sciences
Periodicals
Electronic journals
363.70561 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14629011 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.11.005 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1462-9011
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3791.599550
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22657.xml