Integrating partitioned evapotranspiration data into hydrologic models: Vegetation parameterization and uncertainty quantification of simulated plant water use. Issue 6 (30th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schreiner‐McGraw, Adam P.; Ajami, Hoori; Anderson, Ray G.; Wang, Dong
• Is Part Of: Hydrological processes. Volume 36:Issue 6(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-05-30
• Subjects: agriculture -- eddy covariance -- land surface modelling -- partitioning evapotranspiration -- uncertainty; Hydrology -- Periodicals; Hydrology -- Research -- Periodicals; Hydrologic models -- Periodicals; Hydrological forecasting -- Periodicals; 631.432
• DOI: 10.1002/hyp.14580
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0885-6087

Abstract

Abstract: Accurate simulation of plant water use across agricultural ecosystems is essential for various applications, including precision agriculture, quantifying groundwater recharge, and optimizing irrigation rates. Previous approaches to integrating plant water use data into hydrologic models have relied on evapotranspiration ( ET ) observations. Recently, the flux variance similarity approach has been developed to partition ET to transpiration ( T ) and evaporation, providing an opportunity to use T data to parameterize models. To explore the value of T / ET data in improving hydrologic model performance, we examined multiple approaches to incorporate these observations for vegetation parameterization. We used ET observations from five eddy covariance towers located in the irrigated San Joaquin Valley, California, to parameterize orchard crops in an integrated land surface—groundwater model. By using ET, or both ET and T data, we examined the impact of multiple model parameterization approaches ranging from simple performance metrics to the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method. We find that a simple approach of selecting the parameter sets based on ET and T performance metrics works best at these study sites. Selecting parameters based on performance relative to observed ET creates an uncertainty of 27% relative to the observed value. When parameters are selected using both T and ET data, this uncertainty drops to 24%. Similarly, the uncertainty in potential groundwater recharge drops from 63% to 58% when parameters are selected with ET or T and ET data, respectively. While these improvements are minor in an irrigated setting, the value of partitioning ET data may be more useful in non‐irrigated settings. Additionally, using crop type parameters results in similar levels of simulated ET as using site‐specific parameters. Different irrigation schemes create high amounts of uncertainty and highlight the need for accurate estimates of irrigation when performing water budget studies. Abstract : Accurate simulation of plant water use across agricultural ecosystems is essential for various applications, including precision agriculture, quantifying groundwater recharge and optimizing irrigation rates. We use eddy covariance measurements and partition evapotranspiration into plant water use and bare soil evaporation to improve parameterization of vegetation in a land surface model. We test approaches to incorporate this data and quantify the uncertainty in the simulated water budget.