Methamphetamine use among gay men: An interpretive review of a non-sanctioned occupation. Issue 1 (2nd January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gish, Alexander; Kiepek, Niki; Beagan, Brenda
• Is Part Of: Journal of occupational science. Volume 27:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 26
• Page End: 38
• Publication Date: 2020-01-02
• Subjects: Substance use -- Methamphetamines -- Gay men -- Motivations -- Harm reduction; Consommation de drogue -- méthamphétamines -- hommes gays -- motivations -- réduction des dommages; Work -- Periodicals; Occupations -- Sociological aspects -- Periodicals; Occupational therapy -- Periodicals; 306.3605
• DOI: 10.1080/14427591.2019.1643398
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1442-7591

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Introduction . Attending to the nuanced meanings of non-sanctioned occupations holds the potential to better grasp the influences of occupational contexts at multiple levels. We examined the recreational use of methamphetamine (meth) by gay men, attending to potential benefits without undermining potential risks for harm. Our intention was to broaden current knowledge about meth use by gay men and to understand the many motivations and contexts, as well as influences on other occupations. Method . In this interpretive literature review, 15 articles were critically appraised. Themes emerged iteratively, with interpretation focused on deepening understandings of meth use as an occupation, and in relation to other occupations as engaged in by gay men. Results . Four themes were identified: i) motivations for using meth, ii) disinhibition vs. losing control, iii) contextual factors and patterns of use, and iv) meth use, sex, and harm reduction. Discussion . Advantages and valued benefits associated with using meth recreationally co-occur with potential risks and disadvantages. Experiences of meth use shape and are shaped by social and physical contexts, including community norms and group rituals. Using meth also alters engagement in and performance of other occupations, including sex, socializing, productivity (e.g., work, household chores), and leisure occupations (e.g., dancing, playing pool). The centrality of risk to the experience of using meth suggests that perspectives rooted in health promotion and risk avoidance may misconstrue the occupation itself, something to be considered for all non-sanctioned occupations.