Editor's Choice – Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Sex Specific Differences in Adverse Events After Open and Endovascular Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Consistently Worse Outcomes for Women. (September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pouncey, Anna L.; David, Michael; Morris, Rachael I.; Ulug, Pinar; Martin, Guy; Bicknell, Colin; Powell, Janet T.
• Is Part Of: European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery. Volume 62:Number 3(2021)
• Page Start: 367
• Page End: 378
• Publication Date: 2021-09
• Subjects: Abdominal aortic aneurysm -- Endovascular aneurysm repair -- Mortality -- Postoperative outcomes -- Sex; Blood-vessels -- Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals; Blood-vessels -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Vascular Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Vascular Surgical Procedures -- methods -- Periodicals; Vaisseaux sanguins -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques; Vaisseaux sanguins -- Chirurgie endoscopique -- Périodiques; Blood-vessels -- Endoscopic surgery; Blood-vessels -- Surgery; Endoscopy; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 617.413005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.05.029
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1078-5884

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: Previously, reports have shown that women experience a higher mortality rate than men after elective open (OAR) and endovascular (EVAR) repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). With recent improvements in overall AAA repair outcomes, this study aimed to identify whether sex specific disparity has been ameliorated by modern practice, and to define sex specific differences in peri- and post-operative complications and pre-operative status; factors which may contribute to poor outcome. Methods: This was a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of sex specific differences in 30 day mortality and complications conducted according to PRISMA guidance (Prospero registration CRD42020176398). Papers with ≥ 50 women, reporting sex specific outcomes, following intact primary AAA repair, from 2000 to 2020 worldwide were included; with separate analyses for EVAR and OAR. Data sources were Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases 2005 – 2020 searched using ProQuest Dialog. Results: Twenty-six studies (371 215 men, 65 465 women) were included. Meta-analysis and meta-regression indicated that sex specific odds ratios (ORs) for 30 day mortality were unchanged from 2000 to 2020. Mortality risk was higher in women for OAR and more so for EVAR (OR [95% CI] 1.49 [1.37 – 1.61]; 1.86 [1.59 – 2.17], respectively) and this remained following multivariable risk adjustment. Transfusion, pulmonary complications, and bowel ischaemia were more common in women after OAR and EVAR (OAR: ORs 1.81 [1.60 – 2.04], 1.40 [1.28 – 1.53], 1.54 [1.36 – 1.75]; EVAR: ORs 2.18 [2.08 – 2.29] 1.44 [1.17 – 1.77], 1.99 [1.51 – 2.62], respectively). Arterial injury, limb ischaemia, renal and cardiac complications were more common in women after EVAR (ORs 3.02 [1.62 – 5.65], 2.13 [1.48 – 3.06], 1.46 [1.22 – 1.72] and 1.19 [1.03 – 1.37], respectively); the latter was associated with greater mortality risk on meta-regression. Conclusion: Increased mortality risk for women following AAA repair remains. Women had a higher incidence of transfusion, pulmonary and bowel complications after EVAR and OAR. Higher mortality risk ratios for EVAR may result from cardiac complications, additional arterial injury, and embolisation, leading to renal and limb ischaemia. These findings indicate possible causes for observed outcome disparities and targets for quality improvement.