Colonoscopy Trainers Experience Greater Stress During Insertion than Withdrawal: Implications for Endoscopic Curricula. Issue 1 (23rd November 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Colonoscopy Trainers Experience Greater Stress During Insertion than Withdrawal: Implications for Endoscopic Curricula. Issue 1 (23rd November 2019)
- Main Title:
- Colonoscopy Trainers Experience Greater Stress During Insertion than Withdrawal: Implications for Endoscopic Curricula
- Authors:
- Lemke, Madeline
Banwell, Alison
Rubinger, Natalie
Wiepjes, Michelle
Ropeleski, Mark
Vanner, Stephen
Hookey, Lawrence - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Optimal colonoscopy training curricula should minimize stress and cognitive load. This study aimed to determine whether withdrawal or insertion colonoscopy skills training is associated with less stress or cognitive load for trainees or trainers. Methods: In Phase I, participants were randomized to train on either insertion or withdrawal in a simulated environment. In Phase II, participants were randomized to begin with either insertion or withdrawal in patient encounters. Salivary cortisol levels, heart rate, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) surveys were used to assess stress in trainees and trainers. NASA Task Load Index (TLX) survey was used to assess cognitive workload in trainees. Results: In Phase I, trainee stress increased during the simulation training during both withdrawal and insertion compared to baseline, while trainer stress changed minimally. Cognitive load was higher for trainees during withdrawal ( P = 0.005). In Phase II, trainers' STAI scores were greater during insertion training ( P = 0.013). Trainees' stress was highest prior to beginning patient training and decreased during training, while trainer's stress increased during training. Trainees reported insertion training being of greater value (70.0%), while trainers reported withdrawal was preferred (77.8%). Conclusion: Trainees and trainers exhibit important differences in stress during colonoscopy skills training. Trainees reported more stress during simulation trainingAbstract: Background: Optimal colonoscopy training curricula should minimize stress and cognitive load. This study aimed to determine whether withdrawal or insertion colonoscopy skills training is associated with less stress or cognitive load for trainees or trainers. Methods: In Phase I, participants were randomized to train on either insertion or withdrawal in a simulated environment. In Phase II, participants were randomized to begin with either insertion or withdrawal in patient encounters. Salivary cortisol levels, heart rate, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) surveys were used to assess stress in trainees and trainers. NASA Task Load Index (TLX) survey was used to assess cognitive workload in trainees. Results: In Phase I, trainee stress increased during the simulation training during both withdrawal and insertion compared to baseline, while trainer stress changed minimally. Cognitive load was higher for trainees during withdrawal ( P = 0.005). In Phase II, trainers' STAI scores were greater during insertion training ( P = 0.013). Trainees' stress was highest prior to beginning patient training and decreased during training, while trainer's stress increased during training. Trainees reported insertion training being of greater value (70.0%), while trainers reported withdrawal was preferred (77.8%). Conclusion: Trainees and trainers exhibit important differences in stress during colonoscopy skills training. Trainees reported more stress during simulation training and greatest cognitive load during simulation withdrawal, whereas trainers reported greatest stress during patient encounters, particularly training of insertion techniques. Attention to the effect of stress on trainees and trainers and the drivers of stress is warranted and could be incorporated in competency based medical education. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. Volume 4:Issue 1(2021)
- Journal:
- Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
- Issue:
- Volume 4:Issue 1(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 4, Issue 1 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 4
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0004-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 15
- Page End:
- 20
- Publication Date:
- 2019-11-23
- Subjects:
- Colonoscopy -- Endoscopy -- Medical education -- Simulation -- Training
Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
616.33005 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/jcag ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/jcag/gwz031 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2515-2084
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22674.xml