Diagnostic performance of a novel digital immunoassay (RapidTesta SARS-CoV-2): A prospective observational study with nasopharyngeal samples. Issue 1 (January 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Diagnostic performance of a novel digital immunoassay (RapidTesta SARS-CoV-2): A prospective observational study with nasopharyngeal samples. Issue 1 (January 2022)
- Main Title:
- Diagnostic performance of a novel digital immunoassay (RapidTesta SARS-CoV-2): A prospective observational study with nasopharyngeal samples
- Authors:
- Suzuki, Hiromichi
Akashi, Yusaku
Ueda, Atsuo
Kiyasu, Yoshihiko
Takeuchi, Yuto
Maehara, Yuta
Ochiai, Yasushi
Okuyama, Shinya
Notake, Shigeyuki
Nakamura, Koji
Ishikawa, Hiroichi - Abstract:
- Abstract: Introduction: Digital immunoassays are generally regarded as superior tests for the detection of infectious disease pathogens, but there have been insufficient data concerning SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays. Methods: We prospectively evaluated a novel digital immunoassay (RapidTesta SARS-CoV-2). Two nasopharyngeal samples were simultaneously collected for antigen tests and Real-time RT-PCR. Results: During the study period, 1127 nasopharyngeal samples (symptomatic patients: 802, asymptomatic patients: 325) were evaluated. For digital immunoassay antigen tests, the sensitivity was 78.3% (95% CI: 67.3%–87.1%) and the specificity was 97.6% (95% CI: 96.5%–98.5%). When technicians visually analyzed the antigen test results, the sensitivity was 71.6% (95% CI: 59.9%–81.5%) and the specificity was 99.2% (95% CI: 98.5%–99.7%). Among symptomatic patients, the sensitivity was 89.4% (95% CI; 76.9%–96.5%) with digital immunoassay antigen tests, and 85.1% (95% CI; 71.7%–93.8%) with visually analyzed the antigen test, respectively. Conclusions: The sensitivity of digital immunoassay antigen tests was superior to that of visually analyzed antigen tests, but the rate of false-positive results increased with the introduction of a digital immunoassay device.
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of infection and chemotherapy. Volume 28:Issue 1(2022)
- Journal:
- Journal of infection and chemotherapy
- Issue:
- Volume 28:Issue 1(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 28, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0028-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 78
- Page End:
- 81
- Publication Date:
- 2022-01
- Subjects:
- RapidTesta SARS-CoV-2 -- Digital immunoassay -- Nasopharyngeal sample -- SARS-CoV-2 -- COVID-19 -- Asymptomatic patients
Chemotherapy -- Periodicals
Infection -- Periodicals
Communicable diseases -- Chemotherapy -- Periodicals
615.5805 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/1341321X ↗
http://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/10156/index.htm ↗
http://www.springerlink.com/content/1341-321x ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.10.024 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1341-321X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5006.691000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22652.xml