Ablation zone geometry after CT-guided hepatic microwave ablation: evaluation of a semi-automatic software and comparison of two different ablation systems. (1st January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vo Chieu, Van Dai; Wacker, Frank; Rieder, Christian; Pöhler, Gesa H.; Schumann, Christian; Ballhausen, Hanne; Ringe, Kristina I.
• Is Part Of: International journal of hyperthermia. Volume 37:Number 1(2020)
• Page Start: 533
• Page End: 541
• Publication Date: 2020-01-01
• Subjects: Segmentation software -- ablation zone -- microwave ablation -- ellipticity index -- liver -- semi-automatic; Thermotherapy -- Periodicals; 615.832
• DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1766704
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0265-6736

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: The aims of this study were to evaluate a semi-automatic segmentation software for assessment of ablation zone geometry in computed tomography (CT)-guided microwave ablation (MWA) of liver tumors and to compare two different MWA systems. Material and Methods: 27 patients with 40 hepatic tumors (primary liver tumor n = 20, metastases n = 20) referred for CT-guided MWA were included in this retrospective IRB-approved study. MWA was performed using two systems (system 1: 915 MHz; n = 20; system 2: 2.45 GHz; n = 20). Ablation zone segmentation and ellipticity index calculations were performed using SAFIR (Software Assistant for Interventional Radiology). To validate semi-automatic software calculations, results (2 perpendicular diameters, ellipticity index, volume) were compared with those of manual analysis (intraclass correlation, Pearson's correlation, Mann–Whitney U test; p < 0.05 deemed significant. Results: Manual measurements of mean maximum ablation zone diameters were 43 mm (system 1) and 34 mm (system 2), respectively. Correlations between manual and semi-automatic measurements were r = 0.72 and r = 0.66 (both p < 0.0001) for perpendicular diameters, and r = 0.98 ( p < 0.001) for volume. Manual analysis demonstrated that ablation zones created with system 2 had a significantly lower ellipticity index compared to system 1 (mean 1.17 vs. 1.86, p < 0.0001). Results correlated significantly with semi-automatic software measurements ( r = 0.71, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Semi-automatic assessment of ablation zone geometry using SAFIR is feasible. Software-assisted evaluation of ablation zones may prove beneficial with complex ablation procedures, especially for less experienced operators. The 2.45 GHz MWA system generated a significantly more spherical ablation zone compared to the 915 MHz system. The choice of a specific MWA system significantly influences ablation zone geometry.