Labelling of 90Y- and 177Lu-DOTA-Bioconjugates for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: A Comparison among Manual, Semiautomated, and Fully Automated Synthesis. (25th May 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Labelling of 90Y- and 177Lu-DOTA-Bioconjugates for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: A Comparison among Manual, Semiautomated, and Fully Automated Synthesis. (25th May 2017)
- Main Title:
- Labelling of 90Y- and 177Lu-DOTA-Bioconjugates for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: A Comparison among Manual, Semiautomated, and Fully Automated Synthesis
- Authors:
- Iori, Michele
Capponi, Pier C.
Rubagotti, Sara
Esposizione, Luca Rosario
Seemann, Johanna
Pitzschler, Riccardo
Dreger, Thorsten
Formisano, Debora
Grassi, Elisa
Fioroni, Federica
Versari, Annibale
Asti, Mattia - Other Names:
- Wang Fu Academic Editor.
- Abstract:
- Abstract : In spite of the hazard due to the radiation exposure, preparation of 90 Y- and 177 Lu-labelled radiopharmaceuticals is still mainly performed using manual procedures. In the present study the performance of a commercial automatic synthesizer based on disposable cassettes for the labelling of 177 Lu- and 90 Y-DOTA-conjugated biomolecules (namely, DOTATOC and PSMA-617) was evaluated and compared to a manual and a semiautomated approach. The dose exposure of the operators was evaluated as well. More than 300 clinical preparations of both 90 Y- and 177 Lu-labelled radiopharmaceuticals have been performed using the three different methods. The mean radiochemical yields for 90 Y-DOTATOC were 96.2 ± 4.9 %, 90.3 ± 5.6 %, and 82.0 ± 8.4 %, while for 177 Lu-DOTATOC they were 98.3% ± 0.6, 90.8% ± 8.3, and 83.1 ± 5.7 % when manual, semiautomated, and automated approaches were used, respectively. The mean doses on the whole hands for yttrium-90 preparations were 0.15 ± 0.4 mSv/GBq, 0.04 ± 0.1 mSv/GBq, and 0.11 ± 0.3 mSv/GBq for manual, semiautomated, and automated synthesis, respectively, and for lutetium-177 preparations, they were 0.02 ± 0.008 mSv/GBq, 0.01 ± 0.03 mSv/GBq, and 0.01 ± 0.02 mSv/GBq, respectively. In conclusion, the automated approach guaranteed reliable and reproducible preparations of pharmaceutical grade therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals in a decent RCY. The radiation exposure of the operators remained comparable to the manual approach mainly due toAbstract : In spite of the hazard due to the radiation exposure, preparation of 90 Y- and 177 Lu-labelled radiopharmaceuticals is still mainly performed using manual procedures. In the present study the performance of a commercial automatic synthesizer based on disposable cassettes for the labelling of 177 Lu- and 90 Y-DOTA-conjugated biomolecules (namely, DOTATOC and PSMA-617) was evaluated and compared to a manual and a semiautomated approach. The dose exposure of the operators was evaluated as well. More than 300 clinical preparations of both 90 Y- and 177 Lu-labelled radiopharmaceuticals have been performed using the three different methods. The mean radiochemical yields for 90 Y-DOTATOC were 96.2 ± 4.9 %, 90.3 ± 5.6 %, and 82.0 ± 8.4 %, while for 177 Lu-DOTATOC they were 98.3% ± 0.6, 90.8% ± 8.3, and 83.1 ± 5.7 % when manual, semiautomated, and automated approaches were used, respectively. The mean doses on the whole hands for yttrium-90 preparations were 0.15 ± 0.4 mSv/GBq, 0.04 ± 0.1 mSv/GBq, and 0.11 ± 0.3 mSv/GBq for manual, semiautomated, and automated synthesis, respectively, and for lutetium-177 preparations, they were 0.02 ± 0.008 mSv/GBq, 0.01 ± 0.03 mSv/GBq, and 0.01 ± 0.02 mSv/GBq, respectively. In conclusion, the automated approach guaranteed reliable and reproducible preparations of pharmaceutical grade therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals in a decent RCY. The radiation exposure of the operators remained comparable to the manual approach mainly due to the fact that a dedicated shielding was still not available for the system. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Contrast media & molecular imaging. Volume 2017(2017)
- Journal:
- Contrast media & molecular imaging
- Issue:
- Volume 2017(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2017, Issue 2017 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 2017
- Issue:
- 2017
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-2017-2017-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-05-25
- Subjects:
- Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals
Magnetic resonance imaging -- Periodicals
Contrast media (Diagnostic imaging) -- Periodicals
Contrast Media -- Periodicals
Diagnostic Imaging -- Periodicals
Substances de contraste -- Périodiques
Diagnostics moléculaires -- Périodiques
Imagerie médicale
Substance de contraste
Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme)
Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme)
616.0754 - Journal URLs:
- https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15554317 ↗
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/cmmi/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1155/2017/8160134 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1555-4309
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3426.351450
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22637.xml