Can supplementary contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast avoid needle biopsies in suspicious microcalcifications seen on mammography? A systematic review and meta-analysis. (April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fueger, Barbara J.; Clauser, Paola; Kapetas, Panagiotis; Pötsch, Nina; Helbich, Thomas H.; Baltzer, Pascal A.T.
• Is Part Of: Breast. Volume 56(2021)
• Page Start: 53
• Page End: 60
• Publication Date: 2021-04
• Subjects: Breast -- Sensitivity and specificity -- Biopsy -- Microcalcifications -- Magnetic resonance imaging -- Mammography; Breast -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Breast -- Tumors -- Periodicals; Breast -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.02.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0960-9776

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: To analyze the rate of potentially avoidable needle biopsies in mammographically suspicious calcifications if supplementary Contrast-Enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) is negative. Methods: Using predefined criteria, a systematic review was performed. Studies investigating the use of supplemental CE-MRI in the setting of mammographically suspicious calcifications undergoing stereotactic biopsy and published between 2000 and 2020 were eligible. Two reviewers extracted study characteristics and true positives (TP), false positives, true negatives and false negatives (FN). Specificity, in this setting equaling the number of avoidable biopsies and FN rates were calculated. The maximum pre-test probability at which post-test probabilities of a negative CE-MRI met with BI-RADS benchmarks was determined by a Fagan nomogram. Random-effects models, I 2 -statistics, Deek's funnel plot testing and meta-regression were employed. P-values <0.05 were considered significant. Results: Thirteen studies investigating 1414 lesions with a cancer prevalence of 43.6% (range: 22.7–66.9%) were included. No publication bias was found (P = 0.91). CE-MRI performed better in pure microcalcification studies compared to those also including associate findings (P < 0.001). In the first group, the pooled rate of avoidable biopsies was 80.6% (95%-CI: 64.6–90.5%) while the overall and invasive cancer FN rates were 3.7% (95%-CI: 1.2–6.2%) and 1.6% (95%-CI 0–3.6%), respectively. Up to a pre-test probability of 22%, the post-test probability did not exceed 2%. Conclusion: A negative supplementary CE-MRI could potentially avoid 80.6% of unnecessary stereotactic biopsies in BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications at a cost of 3.7% missed breast cancers, 1.6% invasive. BI-RADS benchmarks for downgrading mammographic calcifications would be met up to a pretest probability of 22%. Highlights: A negative breast MRI can downgrade up to 80.6% of suspicious microcalcifications, potentially avoiding vacuum-assisted breast biopsies. Up to a pretest probability of 22%, a negative breast MRI result would not exceed the 2% cancer rate required for a BI-RADS 3 category assignment.