Hemostatic prophylaxis and colonoscopy outcomes for patients with bleeding disorders: A retrospective cohort study and review of the literature. Issue 2 (6th March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Azer, Sarah M.; Eckerman, Amy L.; Rodriguez, Vilmarie; Nichols, William L.; Ashrani, Aneel A.; Hook, C. Christopher; Marshall, Ariela L.; Pruthi, Rajiv K.
• Is Part Of: Haemophilia. Volume 26:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 257
• Page End: 268
• Publication Date: 2020-03-06
• Subjects: colonoscopy -- haemophilia -- prophylaxis -- von Willebrand disease; Hemophilia -- Periodicals; 616.1572005
• DOI: 10.1111/hae.13954
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1351-8216

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Hemostatic prophylaxis (HP) is recommended for patients with bleeding disorders (PWBD) before invasive procedures. However, evidence‐based guidelines are needed to determine optimal HP strategies. Aim: To determine outcomes of HP for PWBD undergoing colonoscopy. Methods: We undertook a retrospective cohort study of HP and outcomes of colonoscopy procedures performed between 9 November 1993 and 13 February 2018 for PWBD who received care in the Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Hemophilia Treatment Center. Results: During the study period, 73 PWBD (58 with milder phenotypes: haemophilia, von Willebrand disease [subtypes 1 and 2; II, VII and XI deficiency]) underwent 141 procedures. Preprocedural HP was given to 61%, and interventions were performed in 47%. Of the 39% without preprocedural HP, postprocedural HP was given for 11%. One major (0.7%; 6 days postprocedure despite HP) and 10 minor (7%) bleeding complications occurred, which tended to be in patients with severe disease and/or after excision of larger polyps. There was no significant difference in the rate of bleeding complications with or without preprocedural HP (8.1% vs 5.5%, respectively; P = .74, Fisher's exact test). Conclusion: The low bleeding rates in our cohort suggest that preprocedure HP may be withheld for patients with mild bleeding disorders who undergo colonoscopy with a low likelihood of requiring an intervention or who require only low‐risk intervention. This strategy may be best used in experienced centres, provided optimal local hemostasis measures are undertaken and postprocedural HP is rapidly available if high‐risk intervention is required. Further studies are needed to determine optimal evidence‐based HP strategies for PWBD undergoing colonoscopy.