Routine follow-up imaging has limited advantage in the non-operative management of blunt splenic injury in adult patients. Issue 4 (April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liechti, Rémy; Fourie, Lana; Stickel, Michael; Schrading, Simone; Link, Björn-Christian; Fischer, Henning; Lehnick, Dirk; Babst, Reto; Metzger, Jürg; Beeres, Frank J.P.
• Is Part Of: Injury. Volume 51:Issue 4(2020)
• Page Start: 863
• Page End: 870
• Publication Date: 2020-04
• Subjects: Blunt splenic injury -- Non-operative management -- Ongoing bleeding -- Delayed bleeding -- Follow-up imaging -- Abdominal ultrasound -- Abdominal CT scan -- Splenic angio-embolization -- Spleen conserving surgery -- Splenectomy; Wounds and injuries -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Accidents -- Periodicals; Wounds and Injuries -- surgery -- Periodicals; Lésions et blessures -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; Electronic journals; 617.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.089
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-1383

Abstract

Highlights: This study represents the largest cohort of BSI patients with first-line ultrasound follow-up in NOM so far published in the literature. The reports of routine radiological examinations, both ultrasound and CT scan, revealed no new significant findings in 96.4% of the cases. Failure of NOM was significantly associated with clinical deterioration and unplanned follow-up imaging. Significant risk factors for the failure of NOM in this study population were liver cirrhosis and contrast extravasation on initial CT scan. Higher age, ISS and AAST grade were not significantly associated with failure of NOM. Abstract: Background: To date, limited evidence exists regarding follow-up imaging during the non-operative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI), especially concerning ultrasound as first-line imaging modality. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and time to failure of NOM as well as to evaluate the relevance of follow-up imaging. Methods: All adult patients with BSI admitted to our level I trauma center, including two associated hospitals, between 01/01/2010 and 31/12/2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, comorbidities, injury pattern, trauma mechanism, Injury Severity Score, splenic injury grade and free intra-abdominal fluid were reviewed. Additional analysis of indication, frequency, modality, results and consequences of follow-up imaging was performed. Risk factors for failure of NOM were evaluated using fisher's exact test. Results: A total of 122 patients with a mean age of 43.8 ± 20.7 years (16–84 years) met inclusion criteria. Twenty patients (16.4%) underwent immediate intervention. One-hundred-and-two patients (83.6%) were treated by NOM. Failure of NOM occurred in 4 patients (3.9%). Failure was significantly associated with active bleeding (3 of 4 [75%] failures vs. 8 of 98 [8.2%] non-failures, OR 33.75, 95% CI 3.1, 363.2, p = 0.004), and liver cirrhosis (2 of 4 [50%] failures vs. 0 of 98 [0%] non-failures, OR 197, 95% CI 7.4, 5265.1, p = 0.001). Eighty patients (78.4%) in the NOM-Group received follow-up imaging by ultrasound (US, n = 51) or computed tomography (CT, n = 29). In 57 cases, routine imaging examinations were conducted (43 US and 14 CT scans) without prior clinical deterioration. Fifty-fife (96.4%) of these imaging results revealed no new significant findings. Every failure of NOM was detected following clinical deterioration in the first 48 h. Conclusion: To our knowledge this study includes the largest single centric patient cohort undergoing ultrasound as first-line follow-up imaging modality in the NOM setting of BSI in adult patients. The results indicate that a routine follow-up imaging, regardless of the modality, has limited therapeutic advantage. Indication for radiological follow-up should be based on clinical findings. If indicated, a CT scan should be used as preferred imaging modality.