Analytical and clinical validation of an ELISA for specific SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies. Issue 2 (27th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tré‐Hardy, Marie; Wilmet, Alain; Beukinga, Ingrid; Favresse, Julien; Dogné, Jean‐Michel; Douxfils, Jonathan; Blairon, Laurent
• Other Names: Luo Guangxiang (George) guestEditor.; Ly Hinh guestEditor.; Gao Shou‐Jiang guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical virology. Volume 93:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: 803
• Page End: 811
• Publication Date: 2020-07-27
• Subjects: antibodies -- COVID‐19, ELISA -- IgA -- IgG -- IgM -- kinetics -- SARS‐CoV‐2; Virology -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26303
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0146-6615

Abstract

Abstract: The development of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) serological tests is massive. The external validation of their performance is needed before use in clinical routine practice. Our study aims at assessing the analytical and clinical performance of two enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay tests detecting antibodies directed against the virus nucleocapsid protein: The NovaLisa SARS‐CoV‐2 immunoglobulin G (IgG), immunoglobulin A (IgA), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) test (NovaTec) allowing a separate detection of each antibody and the Platelia SARS‐CoV‐2 Total Ab test (Bio‐Rad) detecting total antibodies (IgM, IgA, and IgG). Two‐hundred and eight coronavirus disease 2019 samples from 48 quantitative reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐qPCR) confirmed patients were used to perform the sensitivity analysis. Non‐SARS‐CoV‐2 sera (n = 79) with a potential cross‐reaction to SARS‐CoV‐2 immunoassays were included in the specificity analysis. In addition, using receiver operator characteristic curves, adapted cut‐off for improvement of the performances were proposed. The kinetics of these antibodies was also assessed over 8 weeks. Two weeks after the RT‐qPCR positive detection, the NovaLisa test shows a sensitivity and specificity of 94.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.1%‐98.6%) and 96.2% (95% CI: 89.4%‐98.7%) for IgG, of 89.7% (95% CI: 76.4%‐95.9%) and 98.7% (95% CI: 93.2%‐98.8%) for IgA, and of 48.7% (95% CI: 33.9%‐63.8%) and 98.7% (95% CI: 93.2%‐99.8%) for IgM. With the Platelia system, the specificity and sensitivity were 97.4% (95% CI: 92.1%‐99.7%) and 94.9% (95% CI: 87.7%‐98.0%) for total antibodies using the adapted cut‐offs. The NovaLisa and the Platelia tests have satisfactory analytical performances. The clinical performances are excellent for IgG, IgA, and total antibodies especially if the cut‐off is optimized. Highlights: The sensitivity and the specificity of the NovaLisa (for immunoglobulin G [IgG] and immunoglobulin A [IgA]) and the Platelia were excellent. Cut‐off optimizations improve the clinical performances of both assays. Over a period of 8 weeks, IgM and IgA gradually disappeared while IgG remain persistent.