Direct oral anticoagulant adsorption: Impact on lupus anticoagulant testing—Review of the literature and evaluation on spiked and patient samples. (25th June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: De Kesel, Pieter M.; Devreese, Katrien M. J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis. Volume 18:Number 8(2020)
• Page Start: 2003
• Page End: 2017
• Publication Date: 2020-06-25
• Subjects: apixaban -- dabigatran -- edoxaban -- lupus coagulation inhibitor -- rivaroxaban; Thrombosis -- Periodicals; Hemostasis -- Periodicals; Blood coagulation disorders -- Periodicals; 616.1
• DOI: 10.1111/jth.14894
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1538-7933

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) interfere with lupus anticoagulant (LAC) testing. DOAC‐Stop (D‐S) represents a preanalytical strategy to cope with this issue. Objectives: To assess D‐S's ability to remove DOACs from plasma and overcome DOAC interference in LAC assays and to evaluate D‐S's applicability in a representative patient cohort with routine LAC request. Methods: Apixaban (30‐933 ng/mL), edoxaban (31‐1060 ng/mL), rivaroxaban (35‐1020 ng/mL), and dabigatran (20‐360 ng/mL) were spiked to normal plasma. Aliquots were treated with D‐S or untreated before DOAC and LAC testing. Patient samples containing DOAC (n = 43), vitamin K antagonists (n = 25), heparins (n = 21), or no anticoagulants (n = 63) were tested for LAC before and after D‐S. Results: Spiking experiments revealed false‐positive LAC from low concentrations of DOACs except for apixaban. Following D‐S, DOAC levels were below lower limits of quantification, except for apixaban at the highest concentration, and no false‐positive LAC was obtained. DOAC levels were below lower limits of quantification after D‐S in 39/43 DOAC‐containing patient samples. For 23/29 LAC‐positive DOAC‐containing samples, LAC tests became negative after D‐S, whereas 3/6 samples remaining positive were from patients with (high probability for) antiphospholipid syndrome. In the non‐DOAC‐treated groups, LAC changed from positive to negative in 10 and vice versa in 2 cases. Conclusions: D‐S limits DOAC interference in LAC assays. DOAC concentration measurement should be performed in D‐S treated samples because incomplete removal may occur. Applying D‐S to vitamin K antagonist‐containing, heparin‐containing, or not‐anticoagulated samples may lead to erroneous LAC results. Therefore, D‐S should only be used in plasma from DOAC‐treated patients.