Relationship of diabetes, heart failure, and N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation. (20th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hofer, Felix; Pailer, Ulrike; Sulzgruber, Patrick; Gerges, Christian; Winter, Max‐Paul; Giugliano, Robert P.; Gottsauner‐Wolf, Michael; Hülsmann, Martin; Kazem, Niema; Koller, Lorenz; Schönbauer, Robert; Niessner, Alexander; Hengstenberg, Christian; Zelniker, Thomas A.
• Is Part Of: ESC heart failure. Volume 9:Number 4(2022)
• Page Start: 2367
• Page End: 2377
• Publication Date: 2022-05-20
• Subjects: Heart failure -- Diabetes mellitus -- NT‐proBNP -- Atrial fibrillation; Heart failure -- Periodicals; 616.129005
• DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13930
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2055-5822

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: We aim to explore the relationship of heart failure (HF) and diabetes with cardiovascular (CV) death or hospitalization for HF (HHF) and to study the clinical utility of N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) in an unselected patient population with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and results: Patients with AF admitted to a tertiary academic center between January 2005 and July 2019 were identified through a search of electronic health records. We used Cox regression models adjusted for age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes, HF, body mass index, prior myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, hypertension, smoking, C‐reactive protein, and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol. To select the most informative variables, we performed a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression with 10‐fold cross‐validation. In total, 7412 patients (median age 70 years, 39.7% female) were included in this analysis and followed over a median of 4.5 years. Both diabetes [adjusted (Adj.) HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.55–2.25] and HF (Adj. HR 2.57, 95% CI 2.22–2.98) were significantly associated with CV death/HHF after multivariable adjustment. Compared with patients with diabetes, HF patients had a higher risk of HHF but a similar risk of CV and all‐cause death. NT‐proBNP showed good discriminatory performance (area under the curve 0.78, 95% CI 0.77–0.80) and the addition of NT‐proBNP to the covariates used for adjustment resulted in a significant area under the curve improvement (Δ = 0.04, P < 0.001). With least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, the strongest associations for CV death/HHF were obtained for NT‐proBNP [HR 1.91 per 1‐SD in log‐transformed biomarker], HF (HR 1.72), and diabetes (HR 1.56). Conclusions: Diabetes and HF were independently associated with an increased risk of CV death/HHF in an unselected AF patient population, and NT‐proBNP improved risk assessment. These findings suggest that AF patients with diabetes and/or HF should be managed not only for their risk of stroke and systemic embolic events but also for CV death/HHF.