Prairie grouse and wind energy: The state of the science and implications for risk assessment. (17th June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lloyd, John D.; Aldridge, Cameron L.; Allison, Taber D.; LeBeau, Chad W.; McNew, Lance B.; Winder, Virginia L.
• Is Part Of: Wildlife Society bulletin. Volume 46:Number 3(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-06-17
• Subjects: anthropogenic structures -- Centrocercus urophasianus -- greater prairie‐chicken -- greater sage‐grouse -- lesser prairie‐chicken -- sharp‐tailed grouse -- Tympanuchus cupido -- Tympanuchus pallidicinctus -- Tympanuchus phasianellus -- wind energy; Wildlife management -- Periodicals; Wildlife conservation -- Periodicals; 333.9540973
• DOI: 10.1002/wsb.1305
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0091-7648

Abstract

Abstract: How to shape the anticipated build‐out of industrial‐scale renewable energy in a way that minimizes risk to wildlife remains contentious. The challenge of balancing wildlife conservation and decarbonization of the electricity sector is well illustrated in the grasslands and shrub‐steppe of North America. Here, several endemic species of grouse are the focus of intensive, long‐term conservation action by a host of governmental and nongovernmental entities, many of whom are now asking whether anticipated increases in the number of wind‐energy facilities will exacerbate declines or prevent recovery of these species. To address this question, we synthesized the potential consequences of wind‐energy development on prairie grouse. Published literature on behavior or demography of prairie grouse at wind‐energy facilities is sparse, with studies having been conducted at only 5 different facilities in the United States. Only 2 of these studies met the standard for robust impact analysis by collecting pre‐construction data and using control sites or gradient designs. Only one species, greater prairie chicken, had published results available for >1 facility. Most (10/12) studies also drew conclusions based on short (<4 years) periods of study, which is potentially problematic when studying highly philopatric species. Given these caveats, we found that, in the short‐term, adult survival and nest success appear largely unaffected in populations exposed to wind‐energy facilities. However, changes in habitat use by female greater sage‐grouse and female greater prairie‐chicken during some seasons and reduced lek persistence among male greater prairie‐chickens near wind turbines suggest behavioral responses that may have demographic consequences. Prairie grouse can coexist with wind‐energy facilities in some cases, at least in the short term, but important uncertainties remain, including the potential for long‐term, cumulative effects of the extensive development expected as states attempt to meet goals for generating electricity from renewable sources. Abstract : A review of published research reveals that construction and operation of wind‐energy facilities has not been demonstrated to produce deleterious effects on vital rates of prairie grouse but can induce changes in the selection and use of habitat by individuals of these species. Prairie‐grouse populations can likely co‐exist with wind‐energy facilities in some cases, at least in the short term, but important uncertainties remain, including the potential for long‐term, cumulative effects of the extensive development expected as states attempt to meet goals for generating electricity from renewable sources.